Sorry Andrew: in my previous answer, I forgot to mention an important 
remark.
Reason why earlier (grin grin) I pretended not to understand your 
20070710222201 is twofold.

1. Input:
If input like you wrote it, your string would never be recognized, by any 
spreadsheet application, as a valid date and time string, but only as a 
plain number. You could easily predict the consequences.
On the contrary, "2007-07-10" (with or without addition " 22:22:01") WILL 
always be recognized and interpreted correctly as date (and time). Like 
input "07-10" default would (should!!) always correctly be recognized and 
interpreted as date, "[present year]-07-10".

2. User recognition:
If your format was to be shown in the FORMULA bar, a reader would be puzzled 
because of the obvious "number" value shown there, and would NOT see a 
direct link between that value and cell representation (e.g. as serial 
number!) of the matching date.
On the contrary, format "yyyy-mm-dd" should ONLY be recognized as date 
(extended representation) and could never be misinterpreted; it would link 
that info directly to whatever representation applied in the cell itself.

Regards,
Jan



"Andrew Douglas Pitonyak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Jan Sax wrote:
>> "Andrew Douglas Pitonyak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht 
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> I would use 20070710222201
>>>
>> What DATE might that string represent?
>>
> July 10, 2007, at 22:22:01.00
>
> I use the format so that I can send files around and they will fort using 
> an ASCII sort. The standard does not require delimiters.
> All my files are in the same time zone, but unless you bother to insert 
> the time zone information, the format YYYY-MM-DD etc... is still useless 
> unless I know for certain who sent me the file and what time zone they 
> happen to be in (Yeah, I deal with that and it is annoying. I ask for data 
> in GMT, but what do I get? Look, the data arrived before it was sent... 
> <grumble grumble> )
>
> This site has some good information on 8601
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601
>
>
>>> Do you speak Esperanto?
>>>
>> No, ISO 8601 (and a couple of foreign languages as well).
>>
> Based on the strength of your statements, I assumed that I might find you 
> at one of the Esperanto meetings.
>> Regards,
>> Jan
>>
>>
>>> Jan Sax wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry, wrong message date at the end, should read 2007-07-04
>>>>
>>>> "Jan Sax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in bericht news:...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I would use 20070710222201
>>>
>>> Strongly worded... Do you speak Esperanto?
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Andrew Pitonyak
> My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
> My Book: http://www.hentzenwerke.com/catalog/oome.htm
> Info:  http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
> See Also: http://documentation.openoffice.org/HOW_TO/index.html 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to