On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:25:09 +0000 jonathon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank wrote: > >NOT the fact that they are distributing OO, but that they are not meeting > >their > obligations under the LGPL. > > a) Who is authorized to sue the vendors whose distribution of OOo > violates the obligations of the LGPL? The copyright holders are the only ones with standing. In the case of OO, I guess that would be Sun. > > b) Why is that entity not taking action against vendors of OOo who > violate their obligations under the LGPL? That is a question that you would have to ask them. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
