Original file opened just fine on OOo 2.2.0 on windoze. I suspect there's something wrong with your install.
-----Original Message----- From: Dotan Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 5:43 AM To: Dave Barton Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [users] OOo v2.1 document not opening in v2.2 on same computer Reply CCed to list to update on progress. On 06/09/07, Dave Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dotan, > > Apologies for an off-list reply, but some list subscribers get a bit > upset about attachments to list postings. Of course. > I opened the document with OOo Writer 2.2.1 (official edition) on SuSE > 10.2 with no difficulty, or requests for filters. Amazed that my > Australian English only setup displayed Hebrew perfectly. That's the power of UTF-8! It only boils down to whether or not you have fonts with the correct glyphs. > I added one carriage return to the end of the document and saved the > attached file. Hope this opens OK for you. I have removed OOo 2.2.0 and I'm having a hard time installing the latest 2.2.1. As soon as it installs I'll take a look. Thanks. > Is there some reason why you built from tarball, or is it a matter of > personal preference? I find that the rpms always works well for my SuSE > installs. Er, I did mean RPMS. I don't install OOo so frequently, and I forgot how it is distributed. Much software is distributed as tarballs. I install from the official RPMs because Fedora removes parts of OOo that are critical to me. All in the interest of open software, of course. Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il -- א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
