On 10/24/07, Sales Dept wrote: > Who you think you are to take permission without our consent to show a > private mail, did you have a signed permission
You consented to the public dissemination of your email by sending it to a public mailing list. >i wonder how many business did you showed private info. Only businesses which put "private information" in messages that they knowingly sent to a public mailing list. > For your own good revocate this before all your customers will see that you > are not trustfull, and we cant trust you anymore. If you nicely ask the site administrator for each and every organization that has publicly archived your message that was knowingly and willfully sent to a public mailing list, you might be able to convince them to delete said message. However, such action is more likely to result in the Streisand Effect than not. "Customer" implies a financial transaction. Since OOo is distributed gratis on the openoffice.org website, a discussion about "customers" is somewhat misleading. If you'd rather use the term "user" than "customer", then the issue of trust revolves around one very simple thing. To wit: How secure is the program? That can be determined through an analysis of the source code, which is publicly distributable under the GNU LGPL. If there any defects in that source code, such as multiplying two numbers together, to get an inaccurate answer, then there would be a reason not assume the program is insecure, and therefor untrustworthy. One could either fix that code, or switch to a program which does not exhibit such defects, and hence is more secure, and worthy of one's trust. > At least Microsoft protect emails. The Halloween documents indicate otherwise. > In two days if this is not erased besure we will bring this to court. Your first legal issue is jurisdiction; Your second legal issue is what the lawsuit will be about; Your third legal issue is whether or not the same party can be both a plaintiff and a defendant in the same lawsuit, from the inception of said lawsuit. > Dont worry we will never use or goes to your site or else we dont have > anytrust. The only secure computer is one which has no connection to any other computer, and which is in a physical location to which nobody has access. Overhauling your security protocol to meet those requirements will prevent further occurrences of your organization knowingly sending private information to public mailing lists. > This will be sent to us news too. I see that you CC'd _The New York Times_ and _The Washington Post_ on this issue. Neither of those organizations is _US News_. Their contact information can be found at http://www.usnews.com/usnews/usinfo/infomain.htm. xan jonathon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
