M. Fioretti wrote: > I'm trying this way since repeated discussions on list and a direct > request off list seem to have gone completely unnoticed. > > James, the whole list agreed just a couple of weeks ago that sending > REPLIES to messages with meaningless empty subjects like > "[users][moderated]" WITHOUT replacing that "[users][moderated]" tag > with a subject which actually indicates what the argument is is a > disservice to both the list, the unsubscribed users and everybody > who searches in the archives. > > I and, am sure, everybody else, sincerely admire and appreciate the > time you devote to supporting OOo users, and are sure that this habit > is an absolutely unvoluntary one. Nevertheless, it does make the list > and your own effort less useful. Please take the time from now on to > fix empty subjects when you decide to reply to "[users][moderated]" or > similar messages. > > Thanks again for your support to OOo users! > > Marco Fioretti > > NOTE: yes, James isn't the only subscriber with this habit, he's just > the most consistant, and of course the request above applies to all > those who do the same. > > I ignore those discussions, as they often turn into flame wars, so I didn't see any such agreement. Care to post it?
Perhaps the proper method is to fix the web site, so that a user cannot submit the problem, until a subject has been entered. I've often been to web sites, where I cannot proceed, until all mandatory fields are filled. Many of those sites describe the error in bright red text, so there's no excuse for not filling in all fields. Just leaving a dummy subject is not good enough. Also, I've noticed not everyone here agrees with you. -- Use OpenOffice.org <http://www.openoffice.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
