On 13/02/2008, Barbara Duprey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are a number of oddities about the behavior of merged cells, > basically coming (I think) from the way the merged cell is identified to > the various row/column manipulation functions. It may be a pretty deep > problem to fix. I've reported what is probably a related issue: a > vertically merged cell is allowed to break across page boundaries when > row breaks are not allowed. This is the other side of the coin from what > you're saying about being able to delete rows that have a vertically > merged spanning cell (I don't think it needs to be the first column, > though that's the most frequent, probably). > > There's also interference with the cell boundary lines under various > conditions. Altogether, the merged cell needs to retain its individual > cell identities in some ways but not in others, which gets really > tricky! (And let's not even get into weird stuff like L-shaped cells, > with a mix of horizontal and vertical merging.)
I could not produce L-shaped cells in my testing. Does this work for you? Under what conditions? Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
