On Monday 10 March 2008 13:50, mike scott wrote:
> On 10 Mar 2008 at 12:05, Harold Fuchs wrote:
> > On 10/03/2008, mike scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > Still something weird going on. I /know/ HF is subscribed - yet
> > > there's no unsubscription info at the bottom of his posting.  I
> > > raised this the other day - opinion seemed to be that if subscribed
> > > => get unsub info message; if not subscribed => no unsub info (which
> > > seemed fair at the time).
> > >
> > > So.......?
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://www.scottsonline.org.uk lists incoming sites blocked because
> > > of spam
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Mike Scott, Harlow, Essex, England
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Hmmm. I know MS is subscribed, and he's right that I am but I see the
> > unsubscribe info message; in fact, the one from MS's message is directly
> > above this text.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Harold Fuchs
> > London, England
> > Please reply *only* to [email protected]
>
> This gets odder. Harold's mail as it is arrived here is quoted above
> with only middle chunk snipped out. No 'how to unsubscribe message'
> tacked on the end.
>
> My /own/ earlier mail arrived back to me as he says, /with/ an
> unsubscription message. Likewise another message in my mbx with those
> two also had the unsub info added.
>
> Is anyone else noticing this - or is it just my gremlins playing up?

Yes, I have noticed this, exactly as described.  But I am well endowed with 
gremlins too. ;-)

Lisi

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to