On 13 Mar 2008 at 15:49, Dotan Cohen wrote: > On 13/03/2008, mike scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Looking at the effect phorm's systems(*) will have on privacy of > > documents, it appears windows users may have a potential problem > > where linux users don't.
[ users => 'OOo users'. Sorry] > > I am not familiar with the situation regarding phorm, but there is .... > anti-spyware and all those products. Artificial problems are created > and tolerated to fuel the patch-and-repair industry: Norton, McAfee, > and friends. Someone will develop a $20 tool that will solve whatever Not in this case. Someone's getting between me and the net at large - there's no local cure for that :-( :-( > problem you are describing. Should this problem/solution be found > profitable, then the problem will be exported to other locales. > Nothing new. -- http://www.scottsonline.org.uk lists incoming sites blocked because of spam [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Scott, Harlow, Essex, England --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
