On Wed, 21 May 2008 21:45:14 -0400
"Jerry Clancy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Jerry,
> Thanks for the clarification, Brad. I loved the last line of the wiki
You're welcome, Jerry.
> So, having read ahead in the thread, the issue simply comes down to
> "sign at your own risk," since many OE users are simply not going to
Attachments only have a "risk factor" because M$ stupidly introduced an
option to try to execute any attachment included, if the user wished.
Virus writer's ambrosia, IYAM.
> open the attachment of a blank message. There's no right or wrong
> here, just a fact of life.
Inline signing is deprecated, whilst MIME signing is RFC compliant. So,
whilst currently in-line signing is "okay", at some point that will
cease to be the case. Of course, I don't expect M$ to follow along the
correct path any time soon.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad never immediately apparent"
Watching the people get lairy
I Predict A Riot - Kaiser Chiefs
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
