Hi Albert,

I am observing some issue related to SMR.
In my setup, I am having 2 eid's(4.4.4.0/24, 2.2.2.0/24) registered to MS
via XTR1, using netconf interface I am deleting one eid (2.2.2.0/24) after
delete, XTR1 is not sending SMR to its cached entries (map_cache).
As per my understanding, It suppose to send SMR for 2.2.2.0/24 to ITR (XTR3)
Please correct me, If i am wrong.

Debug logs on XTR1

[2016/12/26 15:54:56] DEBUG: Start SMR for local EID 4.4.4.0/24
[2016/12/26 15:54:56] DEBUG: Sending SMRs to PITRs
[2016/12/26 15:54:56] DEBUG-3: LMAPI: Ready to send 12 bytes through API
socket

code pointer:

 OOR_LOG(LDBG_1, "Start SMR for local EID %s", lisp_addr_to_char(eid));

    /* TODO: spec says SMRs should be sent only to peer ITRs that sent us
     * traffic in the last minute. Should change this in the future*/
    /* XXX: works ONLY with IP */
    mcache_foreach_active_entry_in_ip_eid_db(xtr->map_cache, eid, mce) {
        mcache_map = mcache_entry_mapping(mce);
        build_and_send_smr_mreq_to_map(xtr, map, mcache_map);
    } mcache_foreach_active_entry_in_ip_eid_db_end;

    /* SMR proxy-itr */
    OOR_LOG(LDBG_1, "Sending SMRs to PITRs");


commit 361e6c532291ffe487afd028ea8a7120020d3232
Author: albert-lopez <alo...@ac.upc.edu>
Date:   Wed Nov 30 17:48:03 2016 +0100

    SMR changes of a local mapping modified by netconf

Thanks
Nagesh


On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Albert López <alo...@ac.upc.edu> wrote:

> Yes it should. Do you have detected anything strange?
>
> Regards
>
> Albert
>
>
> On 09/11/16 16:53, Nagesh L wrote:
>
> Hi Alberto,
>
> Thank you for providing the netopeer-configuration settings.
> Eid registration via XTR netconf interface is working on my setup.
>
> one more question on LISP, SMR functionality working in lismmob/oor?
>
> Thanks
> Nagesh
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <
> rodriguezna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nagesh,
>>
>> Try to allow complete access to all users. Run "sudo
>> netopeer-configurator" and go to the NACM section. Change the settings to
>> look like the ones below.
>>
>> │Netopeer           ││Access control is OFF                                  
>>   │
>> │Intercommunication ││Using system groups is ALLOWED                         
>>   │
>> │NACM               ││                                                       
>>   │
>> │                   ││Default action for read requests: PERMIT               
>>   │
>> │                   ││Default action for write requests: PERMIT              
>>   │
>> │                   ││Default action for execute requests: PERMIT            
>>   │
>> │                   ││                                                       
>>   │
>> │                   ││Add users with unlimited access                        
>>   │
>> │                   ││  alberto (your ussername here)                        
>>                        │
>> │                   ││
>>
>> You can try to take a look here as well
>>
>> https://github.com/CESNET/netopeer/wiki/AccessControl
>>
>> Let us know if that solves the issue.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Alberto
>>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@openoverlayrouter.org
http://mail.openoverlayrouter.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to