Hi Albert

I found the problem

It seems I misunderstood everything, when configured different IIDs for
each site :(
Now, with the same IIDs, it is working for VXLAN and LISP.

Thanks, anyway
JM


El vie., 10 feb. 2017 a las 11:31, José Miguel Guzmán (<
jmguz...@whitestack.com>) escribió:

> Thanks Albert for your quick reply
>
>
> So, basically I have 4 xTRs
>             LANs                             WANs
> 172.31.64.250/24 (eth1) <---> R1 <----> (eth0)  172.31.72.250/24
> 172.31.65.250/24 (eth1) <---> R2 <----> (eth0)  172.31.73.250/24
> 172.31.66.250/24 (eth1) <---> R3 <----> (eth0)  172.31.74.250/24
> 172.31.67.250/24 (eth1) <---> R4 <----> (eth0)  172.31.75.250/24
>
> This is info for R1
>
> *root@ip-172-31-72-250:~# cat /etc/oor.conf | egrep -v "^#|^$"*
> debug                  = 1
> map-request-retries    = 2
> log-file               = /var/log/oor-R1.log
> operating-mode         = xTR
> encapsulation          = LISP
> rloc-probing {
>     rloc-probe-interval             = 30
>     rloc-probe-retries              = 2
>     rloc-probe-retries-interval     = 5
> }
> map-resolver        = {
>     172.31.55.142
> }
> static-map-cache {
>     eid-prefix          = 172.31.65.0/24
>     iid                 = 13002
>     rloc-address {
>         address         = 172.31.73.250
>         priority        = 0
>         weight          = 0
>     }
> }
> static-map-cache {
>     eid-prefix          = 172.31.66.0/24
>     iid                 = 13003
>     rloc-address {
>         address         = 172.31.74.250
>         priority        = 0
>         weight          = 0
>     }
> }
> static-map-cache {
>     eid-prefix          = 172.31.67.0/24
>     iid                 = 13004
>     rloc-address {
>         address         = 172.31.75.250
>         priority        = 0
>         weight          = 0
>     }
> }
> map-server {
>         address        = 172.31.55.142
>         key-type       = 1
>         key            = yunque
>         proxy-reply    = on
> }
> database-mapping {
>     eid-prefix          = 172.31.64.0/24
>     iid                 = 13001
>     rloc-address {
>         address         = 172.31.72.250
>         priority        = 0
>         weight          = 0
>     }
> }
>
> *root@ip-172-31-72-250:~# ifconfig*
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 12:02:48:d3:aa:92
>           inet addr:172.31.72.250  Bcast:172.31.72.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::1002:48ff:fed3:aa92/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:9001  Metric:1
>           RX packets:49374 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:36030 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>           RX bytes:242451674 (242.4 MB)  TX bytes:5473559 (5.4 MB)
>
> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 12:68:08:c1:52:94
>           inet addr:172.31.64.250  Bcast:172.31.64.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>           inet6 addr: fe80::1068:8ff:fec1:5294/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:625 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:504 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>           RX bytes:28818 (28.8 KB)  TX bytes:21656 (21.6 KB)
>
> lispTun0  Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr
> 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
>           UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING  MTU:1440  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:350 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:500
>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:29400 (29.4 KB)
>
> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
>           inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>           inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
>           UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:65536  Metric:1
>           RX packets:180 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:180 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1
>           RX bytes:13976 (13.9 KB)  TX bytes:13976 (13.9 KB)
>
> *root@ip-172-31-72-250:~# ip rule*
> 0: from all lookup local
> 2: from 172.31.72.250 lookup 2
> 99: from all to 172.31.64.0/24 lookup main
> 99: from all to 172.31.64.0/24 lookup main
> 99: from all to 172.31.64.0/24 lookup main
> 99: from all to 172.31.64.0/24 lookup main
> 99: from all to 172.31.64.0/24 lookup main
> 99: from all to 172.31.64.0/24 lookup main
> 99: from all to 172.31.64.0/24 lookup main
> 100: from 172.31.64.0/24 lookup 100
> 100: from 172.31.64.0/24 lookup 100
> 100: from 172.31.64.0/24 lookup 100
> 100: from 172.31.64.0/24 lookup 100
> 100: from 172.31.64.0/24 lookup 100
> 100: from 172.31.64.0/24 lookup 100
> 100: from 172.31.64.0/24 lookup 100
> 32766: from all lookup main
> 32767: from all lookup default
>
> *root@ip-172-31-72-250:~# ip route*
> default via 172.31.72.1 dev eth0
> 172.31.64.0/24 dev eth1  proto kernel  scope link  src 172.31.64.250
> 172.31.72.0/24 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 172.31.72.250
>
> *root@ip-172-31-72-250:~#  ip route show table 2*
> default via 172.31.72.1 dev eth0  proto static  metric 100
>
> *root@ip-172-31-72-250:~# ip route list table 100*
> default dev lispTun0  proto static  metric 100
>
> In the logs I see that xTR registers successfully in MS
>
> [2017/2/10 14:16:16] DEBUG: *Map-Register* -> flags:PirM record-count: 1
> nonce f8184f415bbddbf8, EID: (IID 13001/32, EID 172.31.64.0/24), MS:
> 172.31.55.142
> [2017/2/10 14:16:16] DEBUG: Sent control message IP: 172.31.72.250 ->
> 172.31.55.142 UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2017/2/10 14:16:16] DEBUG: Sent Map-Register for mapping (IID 13001/32,
> EID 172.31.64.0/24) to 172.31.55.142
> [2017/2/10 14:16:16] DEBUG: Received *Map-Notify*-> flags:ir,
> record-count: 1, nonce F8184F415BBDDBF8, IP: 172.31.55.142 ->
> 172.31.72.250, UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2017/2/10 14:16:16] DEBUG:   Mapping-record -> ttl: 10 loc-count: 1
> action: no-action auth: 1 map-version: 0 eid: (IID 13001/32, EID
> 172.31.64.0/24)
> [2017/2/10 14:16:16] DEBUG:     Locator-record -> flags: L=1,p=0,R=1, p/w:
> 0/0 255/0, addr: 172.31.72.250
> [2017/2/10 14:16:16] DEBUG: Map-Notify message confirms correct
> registration of (IID 13001/32, EID 172.31.64.0/24).Programing next
> Map-Register in 60 seconds
>
> And it seems probes among routers are working
>
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Received *Map-Request*->
> flags:a=0,m=0,p=1,s=0,P=0,S=0, irc: 0 (+1), record-count: 1, nonce:
> de54a1785bdfdfde, IP: 172.31.73.250 -> 172.31.72.250, UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG:  itr-rloc: 172.31.73.250
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG:  dst-eid: (IID 13001/32, EID 172.31.64.0/24)
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Sending *Map-Reply-> *flags:P=1,E=0,S=0,,
> record-count: 1, nonce: de54a1785bdfdfde
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Sent control message IP: 172.31.72.250 ->
> 172.31.73.250 UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Received *Map-Request*->
> flags:a=0,m=0,p=1,s=0,P=0,S=0, irc: 0 (+1), record-count: 1, nonce:
> 909c4ae17fbddfdc, IP: 172.31.74.250 -> 172.31.72.250, UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG:  itr-rloc: 172.31.74.250
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG:  dst-eid: (IID 13001/32, EID 172.31.64.0/24)
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Sending *Map-Reply->* flags:P=1,E=0,S=0,,
> record-count: 1, nonce: 909c4ae17fbddfdc
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Sent control message IP: 172.31.72.250 ->
> 172.31.74.250 UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Sent control message IP: 172.31.72.250 ->
> 172.31.74.250 UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Map-Request Probe for locator 172.31.74.250
> and EID: (IID 13003/32, EID 172.31.66.0/24)
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Sent control message IP: 172.31.72.250 ->
> 172.31.75.250 UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Map-Request Probe for locator 172.31.75.250
> and EID: (IID 13004/32, EID 172.31.67.0/24)
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Sent control message IP: 172.31.72.250 ->
> 172.31.73.250 UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Map-Request Probe for locator 172.31.73.250
> and EID: (IID 13002/32, EID 172.31.65.0/24)
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Received Map-Reply-> flags:P=1,E=0,S=0,,
> record-count: 1, nonce: bb6a4e6c5bbdebff, IP: 172.31.75.250 ->
> 172.31.72.250, UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG:   Mapping-record -> ttl: 10 loc-count: 1
> action: no-action auth: 1 map-version: 0 eid: (IID 13004/32, EID
> 172.31.67.0/24)
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG:     Locator-record -> flags: L=1,p=1,R=1, p/w:
> 0/0 255/0, addr: 172.31.75.250
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG:  Successfully probed RLOC 172.31.75.250 of
> cache entry with EID (IID 13004/32, EID 172.31.67.0/24)
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Received Map-Reply-> flags:P=1,E=0,S=0,,
> record-count: 1, nonce: baca416c5bbfcbff, IP: 172.31.74.250 ->
> 172.31.72.250, UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG:   Mapping-record -> ttl: 10 loc-count: 1
> action: no-action auth: 1 map-version: 0 eid: (IID 13003/32, EID
> 172.31.66.0/24)
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG:     Locator-record -> flags: L=1,p=1,R=1, p/w:
> 0/0 255/0, addr: 172.31.74.250
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG:  Successfully probed RLOC 172.31.74.250 of
> cache entry with EID (IID 13003/32, EID 172.31.66.0/24)
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Received Map-Reply-> flags:P=1,E=0,S=0,,
> record-count: 1, nonce: e8b94e6c5bbdfbed, IP: 172.31.73.250 ->
> 172.31.72.250, UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG:   Mapping-record -> ttl: 10 loc-count: 1
> action: no-action auth: 1 map-version: 0 eid: (IID 13002/32, EID
> 172.31.65.0/24)
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG:     Locator-record -> flags: L=1,p=1,R=1, p/w:
> 0/0 255/0, addr: 172.31.73.250
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG:  Successfully probed RLOC 172.31.73.250 of
> cache entry with EID (IID 13002/32, EID 172.31.65.0/24)
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Received *Map-Request*->
> flags:a=0,m=0,p=1,s=0,P=0,S=0, irc: 0 (+1), record-count: 1, nonce:
> 730b72c2599dcb7f, IP: 172.31.75.250 -> 172.31.72.250, UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG:  itr-rloc: 172.31.75.250
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG:  dst-eid: (IID 13001/32, EID 172.31.64.0/24)
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Sending *Map-Reply*-> flags:P=1,E=0,S=0,,
> record-count: 1, nonce: 730b72c2599dcb7f
> [2017/2/10 14:16:45] DEBUG: Sent control message IP: 172.31.72.250 ->
> 172.31.75.250 UDP: 4342 -> 4342
>
> Full log is attached
>
> Thanks a lot!!
> JM
>
>
> El vie., 10 feb. 2017 a las 5:44, Albert López (<alo...@ac.upc.edu>)
> escribió:
>
> Hi José Miguel,
>
> Could you send us your configuration files and log files? Also it will be
> interesting to see ifconfig, ip route, ip rule, ip route show table #.
> By the way, do you have configured a gateway for your rloc interface?
>
> Best regards
>
> Albert
>
>
>
>
> On 10/02/17 09:20, José Miguel Guzmán wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am very close to make OOR work in Ubuntu... but probably I need some
> little help :)
>
> I have 4 xTR nodes R{1..4}, with LAN{1..4} as EIDs and interconnected
> among them with WAN{1..4} as RLOCs
>
> If I try to ping LAN4 from LAN1, I see packets being received by lispTun0,
> but they don´t go anywhere :(
> So, from R1, I am doing
>
> *ping -I 172.31.64.250 172.31.67.250 *
>
> after what I see the packets in the tunnel:
> *tcpdump -ilispTun0 -n -nn*
> 07:54:50.104742 ip: 172.31.64.250 > 172.31.67.250: ICMP echo request, id
> 12847, seq 222, length 64
> 07:54:51.104745 ip: 172.31.64.250 > 172.31.67.250: ICMP echo request, id
> 12847, seq 223, length 64
> 07:54:52.104721 ip: 172.31.64.250 > 172.31.67.250: ICMP echo request, id
> 12847, seq 224, length 64
> 07:54:53.104761 ip: 172.31.64.250 > 172.31.67.250: ICMP echo request, id
> 12847, seq 225, length 64
> 07:54:54.104746 ip: 172.31.64.250 > 172.31.67.250: ICMP echo request, id
> 12847, seq 226, length 64
> 07:54:55.104748 ip: 172.31.64.250 > 172.31.67.250: ICMP echo request, id
> 12847, seq 227, length 64
>
> This is how lispTun0 looks like
>
> lispTun0  Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr
> 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
>           UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING  MTU:1440  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:350 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:500
>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:29400 (29.4 KB)
>
> I wonder how lispTun0 connects to the other routers?
> In some tunneling examples, I see the PtP information in ifconfig..
>           inet addr:10.0.0.1  P-t-P:10.0.0.2  Mask:255.255.255.252
>
> but here, I don´t see those parameters
> ip tunnel show doesnt return anything
>
> What am I missing?
>
> Thanks! I love the project!!
>
> JM
>
> --
>
>
> *José Miguel Guzmán *Senior Network Consultant
> Latin America & Caribbean
>
>   +1 (650) 248-2490 <+16502482490>
>   +56 (9) 9064-2780 <+56990642780>
>
>   jmguz...@whitestack.com
>
>   jmguzmanc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing 
> listUsers@openoverlayrouter.orghttp://mail.openoverlayrouter.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> --
>
> *José Miguel Guzmán*Senior Network Consultant
> Latin America & Caribbean
>   +1 (650) 248-2490 <+16502482490>
>   +56 (9) 9064-2780 <+56990642780>
>   jmguz...@whitestack.com
>   jmguzmanc
>
-- 

*José Miguel Guzmán*Senior Network Consultant
Latin America & Caribbean
  +1 (650) 248-2490 <+16502482490>
  +56 (9) 9064-2780 <+56990642780>
  jmguz...@whitestack.com
  jmguzmanc
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@openoverlayrouter.org
http://mail.openoverlayrouter.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to