I agree, although when porting from SER to OpenSER it broke some of my logic
Which led me to discover the wonders of branch routing, which was a much better solution to my problem Juha Heinanen wrote: >Tavis P writes: > > > With OpenSER, using the same config, in the same situation it would > > send the CANCEL first to itself and then to the endpoint. > >this is the correct behavior and avoiding it would be difficult, for >example, when the request is forked by the second ser instance. > >-- juha > > > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
