Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Klaus,
the change of ports on INVITE time should be reflected in double record
routing (with both ports) in order to ensure that the sequential
request will follow the same port path. So, the question is, can you
confirm the double RR in the outgoing INVITE from openser?
Yes, double RR works fine. As you see in the BYE:
BYE sip:83.136.32.83:5060;r2=on;ftag=a613b273;nat=yes;lr=on SIP/2.0.
Route: <sip:83.136.32.83:6060;r2=on;ftag=a613b273;nat=yes;lr=on>,
<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:7404>.
both RR are present (Cisco is a strcit router, thus one RR is int eh
request URI, the second one is in the Route header).
Should openser change the sending socket according to the second Route
URI? I've also tried with a loose_router as callee and it again does not
work.
klaus
regards,
bogdan
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi!
I've configure openser to listen also on port udp:6060. The INVITE
comes in to 6060, forwarded to other client on port 5060. Responses
and ACK will be handled correctly - on call leg uses port 6060, the
other call leg 5050.
If now the callee sends a BYE (Cisco, strict router) the BYE will be
forwarded from port 5060 instead of 6060. I didn't find a problem in
the BYE request sent to the openser. Is openser behaving wrong here?
Or do I have to configure special routing for this scenario?
thanks
klaus
BYE from callee (5060) to proxy
U 2005/11/09 16:47:48.254756 83.136.33.19:5060 -> 83.136.32.83:5060
BYE sip:83.136.32.83:5060;r2=on;ftag=a613b273;nat=yes;lr=on SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 83.136.33.19:5060;branch=z9hG4bK3dc73e84.
From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=000dedfb04cc011e597bda33-277ea073.
To: klaus enum.at<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=a613b273.
Call-ID: 7f49f21ed451bb7a.
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:47:47 GMT.
CSeq: 101 BYE.
User-Agent: CSCO/6.
Content-Length: 0.
RTP-RxStat: Dur=??,Pkt=??,Oct=??,LatePkt=??,LostPkt=??,AvgJit=??.
RTP-TxStat: Dur=??,Pkt=??,Oct=??.
Route: <sip:83.136.32.83:6060;r2=on;ftag=a613b273;nat=yes;lr=on>,
<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:7404>.
.
BYE from proxy to caller: is sent from 5060 althouth it should be sent
from 6060.
#
U 2005/11/09 16:47:48.264940 83.136.32.83:5060 -> 84.20.167.143:7404
BYE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:7404 SIP/2.0.
Max-Forwards: 10.
Record-Route:
<sip:83.136.32.83;ftag=000dedfb04cc011e597bda33-277ea073;nat=yes;lr=on>.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 83.136.32.83;branch=z9hG4bKaf5b.fbc8b274.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 83.136.33.19:5060;branch=z9hG4bK3dc73e84.
From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=000dedfb04cc011e597bda33-277ea073.
To: klaus enum.at<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=a613b273.
Call-ID: 7f49f21ed451bb7a.
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:47:47 GMT.
CSeq: 101 BYE.
User-Agent: CSCO/6.
Content-Length: 0.
RTP-RxStat: Dur=??,Pkt=??,Oct=??,LatePkt=??,LostPkt=??,AvgJit=??.
RTP-TxStat: Dur=??,Pkt=??,Oct=??.
.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
