Ok, I'm very confused about this. Bogdan mentioned that the RURI is consumed? When is it consumed?
-----Original Message----- From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:31 AM To: Douglas Garstang Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Users] More Routing.... append_branch will add a new branch. But the t_relay in failure route only uses the new branch, as the previous branch is alreaddy terminated. klaus Douglas Garstang wrote: > Klaus, > > But, doesn't append_branch cause parallel forking? I don't want parallel > forking. If I do parallel forking, the same registration may get delivered to > the same Asterisk box twice, and that's not what I want. > > Doug. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:01 AM > To: Douglas Garstang > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Users] More Routing.... > > > Where's the problem? in route[1] or in the failure route? > > You need append branch in failure route > > klaus > > Douglas Garstang wrote: > >>Can someone please tell me why the following extremely simple example doesn't >>first attempt to relay to 192.168.10.7, and then if that fails, try >>192.168.10.8? What am I missing here? The documentation says that t_relay() >>simple sends statefully to the current URI.... seems to be what I am doing. >>What am I missing? Please help! >> >>route(1); >> >>route[1] { >> rewritehostport("192.168.10.7:5060"); >> t_on_failure("2"); >> t_relay(); >>} >> >>failure_route[2] { >> rewritehostport('192.168.10.8:5060"); >> t_relay(); >>} >> >>Doug. >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Users mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
