Hi guys,

Is anyone working on this?
I'd like to help anyway I can.

-g

On Jan 6, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Greg Fausak wrote:

Howdy guys,

I completely missed this thread.
How is this going?

I just read the roadmap which indicates NAPTR lookup
is on the list.  I've been maintaining NAPTR and SRV records
looking forward to the day when t_relay() forwards using NAPTR (and
SRV). Does that mean that the t_relay() will maintain the state, slogging
through the NAPTR/SRV records appropriately, without me having
to do additional logic??? Specifically, I'm keen on the SRV serial forking.

-g




Hi Bogdan,

I meant t_reply() will keep its behaviour as looking into URI for the
destination - but it will incorporate the NAPTR lookup.

Great - this answers my question.


to response also to on earlier question, regarding the timing
-  I say 3  months are more than enough ;).

Excellent.

Many thanks for your help (and patience ;)
--Joachim



Joachim Fabini wrote:

Hi Bogdan,



indeed, there was a misunderstanding :) .t_relay() with no
param will be kept with the current functionality.
Or you suggest to be able to specify only a different proto
or port from the RURI?



I did not yet find the primitive which is supposed to
statefully relay and do the following:
1. NAPTR query on the transport to use PLUS
2. _exactly_ what t_relay() does now for the
  transport returned by the NAPTR query.

You say that t_relay() is kept with the current functionality.
Does this mean no NAPTR, or will t_relay() be extended to use
NAPTR before SRV/A query? If the latter then everything is OK.

Otherwise we have the alternatives:

t_relay()    -> Stateful relaying according to destination
               address using the incoming transport (no NAPTR).
t_relay_to() -> Stateful relaying to a specific host (you said
               that <host> is mandatory here) using NAPTR to
               determine the transport.


To summarize:
My point is that none of these two primitives covers the case
when the message is to be relayed to the next hop based only
on the destination address _and_ using the transport selected
by the destination proxy (determined via NAPTR query).

Except if either a) t_relay() does NAPTR or b) the host
parameter in t_relay_to() is optional.

--Joachim





--
Greg Fausak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to