Yep, you indeed understand exactly what I'm about to try, replacing the contact by something recognizable ... I was wondering whether someelse was face the same problem.
Thanks, Wolfgang Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Hi, > > I see what you are trying to do. I have some idea about masking the > contact hdr, but you still have to deal with VIA :D..... > > about Contact...since the contact provided by the GW is the same (let's > assume that), before forwarding to the foreign proxy, you may replace > the GW contact with a contact pointing to your server and containing a > token easy to recognize (maybe a username?). > On the way back, if you find the funny contact you inserted (which will > be RURI or Route), you have to restore it to the GW contact.... > > never tried this, but it might work.... > > regards, > bogdan > > Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> you're right, but here the source is the GW and the destination is >> another SIP proxy with SIP phones behind it. And since we are >> terminating calls out of the PSTN to this other SIP proxy, ran by a >> company without voice-license, I need to remove any hint to the identity >> of the caller before handing over the call to that second SIP proxy. >> >> >> Wolfgang >> >> >> >> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Wolfgang, >>> >>> if the destination is a GW and you set a RPID hdr, you do not need to >>> remove the contact and FROM - the GW will silently ignore them. >>> >>> regards, >>> Bogdan >>> >>> Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Really sure that there is no way only using openser? I don't want to >>>> deploy that fat beast additionally just for a single feature. >>>> >>>> Or is there something I haven't considered yet? >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Wolfgang >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Klaus Darilion wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> If you need full privacy, then it is better to use a B2BUA like >>>>> Asterisk. >>>>> >>>>> regards >>>>> klaus >>>>> >>>>> Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> before forwarding a call (INVITE) from the PSTN with flag >>>>>> "privacy=full" >>>>>> in the Remote-Party-ID hf to a none-voice-licensed carrier I need to >>>>>> make sure that the calling party number is completely wiped out from >>>>>> the >>>>>> SIP requests. >>>>>> >>>>>> I see this number at three places: the Remote-Party-ID hf itself, the >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> From hf and the Contact hf. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The Remote-Party-ID hf can simply be dropped or replaced by something >>>>>> anonymous. >>>>>> >>>>>> The From hf can be rewritten using uac_replace_from. >>>>>> >>>>>> But what about the Contact hf? This field is, as far as I can see, >>>>>> required for routing purposes, to tell the called party side where to >>>>>> send replies. So, if I would manage it to rewrite the field, I would >>>>>> have to make sure, the replies sent to the rewritten address once >>>>>> again >>>>>> will be rewritten to target for the meant destination. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there a best practice for this item? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Wolfgang >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Users mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
