On 03/16/06 19:47, Rick Richardson wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 11:46 +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 03/14/06 22:31, Rick Richardson wrote:
I am trying to dispatch a request to a sip proxy.
Is the send() function not set up to take pseudovariables?
send() does not take pseudovariables.
I am trying to use
send(uri:host, uri:port)
but i'm getting a syntax error with an invalid argument when initting
the server.
I was using
forward(uri:host, uri:port);
But I don't want the dispatcher sticking a VIA header on the message.
Is there a reason send is not used in this fashion? I would think that
one would not want any messages being relayed back to the dispatcher for
any reason.
Also, is record routing useful in the dispatching context? I would think
if a message did get back to the dispatcher it would send it to the
proper proxy as long as it was hashing the call-id.
this is up to your configuration file -- you can tune relaying from there.
So what is the best approach for dispatching when it comes to VIA's and
other things? I would guess that from a dispatcher you would not want to
alter the message at all.
This is up to the logic you want to implement and the other things.
Sometimes you have to use the dispatcher on the way back to go through nats.
Cheers,
Daniel
Cheers,
Daniel
any input would be appreciated.
thanks,
Rick
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
