On Wednesday 10 May 2006 04:00, Andreas Granig wrote: Could you use a cached usrloc with a low enough update interval? Or does OpenSER only write it's information to the database at that interval, not read?
Also, cacheless usrloc is only available in the devel version, correct? Thanks. ---Mike > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > > yes, that's right - I will take a look to see how difficult is to change > > t_replicate() to be able to sent to more destinations in parallel. > > I'd really encourage everybody evaluating a clustered solution to try > cacheless usrloc in combination with mysql-cluster. Scales very well, > without the side-effect of inevitable usrloc inconsistency... > > Just my 2 cents, > Andy > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
