Hi Bogdan! I can verify, that the patch is working correctly now! Now the correct headers are removed and the routing is right.
Thanks! Br Walter P.S.: Logs are the same than below, so I don't add it here. -----Original Message----- From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:38 PM To: Walter Schober Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Users] strict to loose - Route Header not removed Hi Walter, I will try to take a look on the issue from 2). Also find attached the patch against the latest devel version - please give it a try a let me know if it fixes your problem. regards, bogdan Walter Schober wrote: >Hi Bogdan! > >1) OpenSER forwards the INVITE correctly including the ;lr parameter. It's >the PSTN GW sending a "strict" ACK. They will fix it. Currently I just take >this GW to reproduce the issue. Yes, 111.222.333.132 is the OS proxy. > >2) I do also believe that it recognizes itself, although grep_sock_info() >returns false. This runs on a test system with that single call only and >yes, this is all the log. >Another issue I see here: >If openser is started with the -l parameter, there is no listener configured >on the IP (address - just the aliases via /etc/hosts). It seems to look into >the hosts file, resolves reverse via hosts file and uses the first hostname >in the hostfile in the grep_sock_info(). So it always compares the incoming >IP with the first hostname in /etc/hosts correlated to that IP. >This doesn't happen, if I specify the listen=udp:111.222.333.132:5060 in the >script and omit the -l option. >Nevertheless I guess, that's not the problem for the strict routing. > >3) It would be great, if you could provide me with that patch to either the >latest CVS snapshot or the 1.0.0 official source. >It's just to verify if it solves my problem, otherwise I will look into it. > >Br >Walter > >-----Original Message----- >From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 12:37 PM >To: Walter Schober >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Users] strict to loose - Route Header not removed > >HI Walter, > >I see here three problems: > >1) as I guess your proxy IP is 111.222.333.132, I find rather strange >why the ACK RURI does not contain the "lr" parameter - OpenSER does only >loose routing and inserts the RR hdr with "lr" and "ftag" params all the >time. Can you check this in the INVITE and 200 OK? It might be a bug in >the phone also. > >2) even if the proxy does recognize the 111.222.333.132 IP as its own >(as it follows the "after_strict" processing), not sure why you get this >"check_self: host != me". Is the output log continuous? > >3) indeed there was a bug in RR "after_strict" processing. I fixed it, >but I cannot commit it since thanks no SF none of the repository is >online (CVS or SVN) :(. > >If yo need it fast, I can generate a patch for you to be able to test. > >Thanks and regards, >Bogdan > > > > >Walter Schober wrote: > > > >>0(30621) parse_headers: flags=200 >>0(30621) is_preloaded: No >>0(30621) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==3 && >> >> >[111.222.333.132] > > >>== [os0] >>0(30621) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 >>0(30621) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==3 && >> >> >[111.222.333.130] > > >>== [os0] >>0(30621) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5084 >>0(30621) grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==3 && >> >> >[111.222.333.130] > > >>== [os0] >>0(30621) grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5084 >> >>Is this the problem? >>0(30621) check_self: host != me >>0(30621) after_strict: Next hop: 'sip:111.222.333.130:5084;lr' is loose >>router >>0(30621) parse_headers: flags=ffffffffffffffff >>0(30621) rewrite_uri: Rewriting Request-URI with >>'sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;x-orig=111.222.444.61:5064;x-orig-nat = >> >> >1 > > >>92.168.40.4:5064' >>0(30621) after_strict: The last route URI: >>'sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;x-orig=111.222.444.61:5064;x-orig-nat = >> >> >1 > > >>92.168.40.4:5064' >>0(30621) xl_printf: final buffer length 18 >> >>Openser 1.0.0. >> >>Br >>Walter >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> >> >Behalf > > >>Of Walter Schober >>Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 8:25 AM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: [Users] strict to loose - Route Header not removed >> >>Hello! >> >>Acc to 3261, 16.4: >>the proxy MUST replace the Request-URI in the request with the last >>value from the Route header field, and remove that value from the >>Route header field. The proxy MUST then proceed as if it received >>this modified request. >> >>The loose_route() function does only the half on my >>if (looose_route()) { >> .. >> t_relay() >> .. >>} >>script. It replaces the RURI with the value of the last Route header, >>but then doesn't remove it, causing problems on the last hop. >> >>The strict.txt contains a ACK with comes in strict and leaves loose - >>with the Route header. >> >>Aliases are configured with ip.ip.ip.ip and ip.ip.ip.ip:5060. >> >>Why is the Route header not stripped? >> >>Walter >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Users mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
