On Wednesday 24 May 2006 07:01, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > I notice that during a dialog session from a UA to the server going to > > the PSTN gateway, it was refering to this Call-ID until the point when > > the request was forwarded to the PSTN gateway. When the PSTN gateway > > replies, it replied with a same Call-ID with a different IP address at > > the back ([EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ) > > That is very wrong. Maybe there is an ALG in the path which replaces the > private address with public ones, but that should not apply to the > call-id. The caller should reject the reply.
I have actually seen an ALG do exactly that before, and my client dropped all messages coming back through it, as expected. ---Mike _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
