On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 12:24 +0300, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > On 05/26/06 00:58, Adrian I. Vasile wrote: > > Ok, done and working like a charm. > > > > Just for my own curiosity, how do I go about doing the same as my > > provider? > > > in which context? What are you using? > > Daniel > Separate machines, one handling sip signalling and the other rtp streams (maybe do transcoding)
I would like to use OpenSER if possible (seems better sip implementation than *) > > > PS: sorry for the TP > > > > On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 00:14 +0300, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> On 05/25/06 01:01, Adrian I. Vasile wrote: > >> > >>> Hi list, > >>> > >>> My upstream provider wants to test a new IP card. The problem is that he > >>> wants to split the signaling from rtp to 2 different hosts. > >>> > >>> The question is how may I accomplish that ? > >>> > >>> > >> somehow, this is transparent for the proxy. The card has to advertise in > >> the SDP the IP and port for media, which can be another address than the > >> signaling. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Daniel > >> > >> > >>> eg: > >>> Signaling goes to A.B.C.D:5060 > >>> RTP goes to A.B.C.E ports raging from 30000 to 32000 > >>> > >>> TIA, > >>> Adrian > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Users mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
