Send Users mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: callback type TMCB_REQUEST_IN (Bogdan-Andrei Iancu)
2. Mixing uri_db and auth_db (Edgar Barbosa)
3. RE:Problems starting openser (BrOtHeR StRaiN)
4. uac_auth cseq workaround - ANY ? (G.Jacobsen)
5. dispatcher module and rewritehost vs forward (Script Head)
6. dispatcher module and rewritehost vs forward (Script Head)
7. Unknown value error (Giuseppe Parlato)
8. Problem : Forwarding Routine to a NAT'd endpoint.
(Ricardo Martinez)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 16:04:26 +0300
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Users] callback type TMCB_REQUEST_IN
To: raviprakash sunkara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi,
as the message says, you need to load TM module before the ACC one.
regards,
bogdan
raviprakash sunkara wrote:
Hi Users and lister...
How R u Guys,
I need help from U , The problem in openser when doing the accounting
module.
it give error as
find_export:found <load_tm> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/openser.modules/tm.so]
ERRoR:tm:register_tmcb: callback type TMCB_request_in register
attempt before tm module initializaton
ERROR :acc:mod_init;cannot register TMCB_REQUEST_IN callback
init_mod() : Error while inittialization module acc
what is means, What i need to do, And give any samle openser.cfg in
accing with radius and mysql
Bye..
--
Thanks and Regards with cheers
Sunkara Ravi Prakash (Voip Developer)
Hyperion Technology
www.hyperion-tech.com <http://www.hyperion-tech.com>
<b>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 16:16:41 +0100
From: "Edgar Barbosa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Users] Mixing uri_db and auth_db
To: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi all,
I'm having a weird behaviour when mixing auth_db and uri_db.
With the following openser.cfg, the xlog("L_INFO", "TEST\n") is never
executed... seems that openser just hangs up...
If I remove the uri_db it works...
If I remove the auth_db it works too...
The problem seems to happen when I mix both...
Any idea of what may be wrong?
I'm using the latest version (openser 1.0.1).
Thanks
debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd)
fork=yes
log_stderror=yes
reply_to_via=no
check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v)
dns=no # (cmd. line: -r)
rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R)
port=5060
children=4
fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/mysql.so"
loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/sl.so"
loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/auth.so"
loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/auth_db.so"
loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/uri_db.so"
loadmodule "/usr/lib/openser/modules/xlog.so"
modparam("uri_db", "db_url", "mysql://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/openser")
modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "mysql://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/openser")
route {
xlog("L_INFO", "TEST\n");
}
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 10:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: BrOtHeR StRaiN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE:[Users] Problems starting openser
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thank you. Finally that configuration worked. However, the quality of the
call was very bad. I couldn't make out a word of what was coming through.
---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great
rates starting at 1¢/min.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://openser.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060529/6358219d/attachment.htm
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:03:05 +0300
From: "G.Jacobsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Users] uac_auth cseq workaround - ANY ?
To: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello,
I am trying to use the uac_auth function against an asterisk box and
receive 488 not acceptable here.
It appears that this is not due to a media problem since the client which
is routed through openser can issue an authenticated invite without
problems when registered directly with the asterisk box - with exactly the
the same media settings.
So I supect that this 488 message is due to the fact that openser does not
increase the cseq during authentication causing asterisk to issue a 488
after the correct response to the challenge.
What are my workaround options to authenticate openser against asterisk
(or any other RFC compliant proxy) ?
ANY practical hints would be highly appreciated.
TIA for your help.
Gerry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://openser.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060529/e13f5c52/attachment.html
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 14:51:22 -0400
From: "Script Head" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Users] dispatcher module and rewritehost vs forward
To: OpenSER-users <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I have the following in my config, which works...
now if I comment forward and comment out rewritehost I get errors. Am I
not
using the correct syntax?
route[5] {
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# PSTN Handler
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
t_on_reply("1");
# do load balancing
ds_select_dst("1","4");
sl_send_reply("100","Trying");
#rewritehost(uri:host);
forward(uri:host,uri:port);
route(4);
route(1);
}
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://openser.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060529/42a0e05e/attachment-0001.htm
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 14:51:22 -0400
From: "Script Head" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Users] dispatcher module and rewritehost vs forward
To: OpenSER-users <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I have the following in my config, which works...
now if I comment forward and comment out rewritehost I get errors. Am I
not
using the correct syntax?
route[5] {
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# PSTN Handler
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
t_on_reply("1");
# do load balancing
ds_select_dst("1","4");
sl_send_reply("100","Trying");
#rewritehost(uri:host);
forward(uri:host,uri:port);
route(4);
route(1);
}
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://openser.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060529/42a0e05e/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 00:25:15 +0200
From: "Giuseppe Parlato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Users] Unknown value error
To: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello
is there a way to ignore an attribute value when I make an authorization
request to MsSQL database? that value is not important I think and it
creates an error:
ERROR:
radius_xlat: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
rlm_sql (sql): sql_set_user escaped user --> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
radius_xlat: 'VoIP_Radius '[EMAIL PROTECTED]''
rlm_sql (sql): Reserving sql socket id: 16
radius_xlat: ''
radius_xlat: 'VoIP_Radius '[EMAIL PROTECTED]','',
'','192.168.1.1','''
rlm_sql: Failed to create the pair: Unknown value VoIP for attribute
Service-Type
rlm_sql (sql): Error getting data from database
radius_xlat: ''
MsSQL authorization queries:
authorize_check_query = "VoIP_Radius '%{User-Name}'"
authorize_reply_query = "VoIP_Radius
'%{User-Name}','%{Calling-Station-Id}', \
'%{Called-Station-Id}','%{NAS-IP-Address}','%{h323-conf-id}','VoIP'"
I tried to remove value VoIP from authorization query but the problem
doesn't expire.
Giuseppe
Thank you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://openser.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060530/09063ec1/attachment.htm
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 18:34:44 -0400
From: Ricardo Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Users] Problem : Forwarding Routine to a NAT'd endpoint.
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello List
I have a problem forwarding a number for a NAT'd endpoint. The
problem presents as follow.
For incoming calls to my OPENSER users i load via
avp_load_radius("callee") the "forward options" for my users.
For example if a user has set the Call Forward ON and the set the
forwarded number, these options are loaded via avp_radius.
So for a incoming call to a user with Call Forward ON, the call is
then redirected to a Asterisk Box to handle the call.
I have no problem with this if the user is not NAT'd, even if is
NAT'd but the user is not registered i can forward the call to my Asterisk
Box via a special route (route[8]) without any problem. But if the NAT'd
endpoint is REGISTERED in my ser BOX like this :
domain: 'location'
aor : '5507515800'
~~~Contact(0x40502de0)~~~
domain : 'location'
aor : '5507515800'
Contact : 'sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5061'
Expires : 560
q :
Call-ID : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
CSeq : 2
User-Agent: 'Linksys/PAP2-3.1.3(LS)'
received : 'sip:64.76.148.248:46139'
State : CS_NEW
Flags : 1
Sock : 64.76.148.246:5060 (0x8132c80)
next : (nil)
prev : (nil)
~~~/Contact~~~~
.../Record...
I'm even using rewritehostport (as indicated in my ser.cfg snipet)
route[8] {
xlog("L_INFO", "[%Tf] : Ruta [8] Enviando llamada a asterisk\n");
rewritehostport("111.76.154.101:5060");
route(4);
route(1);
}
the call is re-routed to the "received" parameter indicated in the
register
RECORD. Please check the next debug taken in my ser box.
111.76.148.237 : Caller Endpoint
111.76.148.246 : OPENSER Box
111.76.148.101 : Asterisk Box
111.76.148.248 : Called Enpoint (NAT'd)
U 111.76.148.237:5060 -> 111.76.148.246:5060
INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 111.76.148.237:5060;branch=z9hG4bKf50b1f9ca.
Max-Forwards: 70.
Content-Length: 304.
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060.
From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=acee04f44a858c7.
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 1032746828 INVITE.
Supported: timer.
Content-Type: application/sdp.
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060.
Supported: replaces.
.
v=0.
o=MxSIP 0 26 IN IP4 111.76.148.237.
s=SIP Call.
c=IN IP4 111.76.148.237.
t=0 0.
m=audio 4978 RTP/AVP 18 4 4 101.
a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000.
a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000.
a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000.
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000.
a=fmtp:18 annexb=no.
a=fmtp:101 0-15.
a=sendrecv.
m=image 4980 udptl t38.
a=sendrecv.
U 111.76.148.246:5060 -> 111.76.148.237:5060
SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to us.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 111.76.148.237:5060;branch=z9hG4bKf50b1f9ca.
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060.
From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=acee04f44a858c7.
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 1032746828 INVITE.
Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.3 (i386/linux)).
Content-Length: 0.
Warning: 392 111.76.148.246:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=22321
req_src_ip=111.76.148.237 req_src_port=5060
in_uri=sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
out_uri=sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 via_cnt==1".
.
U 111.76.148.246:5060 -> 111.76.148.248:46139
INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 SIP/2.0.
Record-Route: <sip:111.76.148.246;ftag=acee04f44a858c7;lr=on>.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 111.76.148.246;branch=z9hG4bK38bc.f157bcd5.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 111.76.148.237:5060;branch=z9hG4bKf50b1f9ca.
Max-Forwards: 16.
Content-Length: 306.
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060.
From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;tag=acee04f44a858c7.
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 1032746828 INVITE.
Supported: timer.
Content-Type: application/sdp.
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060.
Supported: replaces.
.
v=0.
o=MxSIP 0 26 IN IP4 111.76.148.237.
s=SIP Call.
c=IN IP4 111.76.148.246.
t=0 0.
m=audio 35068 RTP/AVP 18 4 4 101.
a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000.
a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000.
a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000.
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000.
a=fmtp:18 annexb=no.
a=fmtp:101 0-15.
a=sendrecv.
m=image 35070 udptl t38.
a=sendrecv.
Why openser is routing the call to the "received" ip address insted of the
ip address indicated in my route[8] by the
rewritehostport("111.76.154.101:5060"); ???
Hope that someone can help me here
Is there a way to avoid this ?
Thanks !
Ricardo Martinez
Ricardo Javier Martinez Ogalde
Ingeniero de Desarrollo
VOISS NET S.A.
Cisco Certified Network Associate ,CCNA (CSCO 10643101)
* : (56 2) 240 81 96
* : (56 2) 245 74 95
* : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
End of Users Digest, Vol 12, Issue 78
*************************************
