Hi,
simple SIP-Proxy refer to a simple config file, like the one provided
by default by openser.
Performance will decrease once your script complexity increases.
but notice that if you do not use any kind of media relay, the proxy is
not affected by the number of parallel calls since it;s transaction
stateful and not dialog stateful....so you can have hundred of thousands
of call in parallel with 0 load on the proxy.
regards,
bogdan
unplug wrote:
What do you mean a 'simple' SIP-Proxy?
Is it UA -- SIPproxy -- UA?
I have also tested openser without using NAT (All device is in the
same network). But the maximum number of current calls is only around
80.
For the configuration file, I use those files download from
http://www.onsip.org/. I think they are the simple configuration that
I can trust.
Finally, just want to say the target usage of openser. Does it target
for a small group of users instead of a global voip environment?
On 5/30/06, Edson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My two cents:
OpenSER/SER can handle hundreds of concurrent calls, but as a 'simple'
SIP-Proxy not as a media-proxy (RTP-Proxy). Your numbers would be
clearer if
You could aggregate information on the loads only from OpenSER/SER,
without
MediaProxy or RTPProxy. You would get some very impressive numbers,
unfortunately dropped by the [Media|RTP]proxy presence.
Try to review Your configuration, so that You forward to media-aware
servers
only calls that needed it (with one UA sitting behind a NAT
box,p.ex.), not
all. It would give a 'little' more headache for design and
maintenance, but
would permit a higher concurrent call number... ;)
Edson.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of unplug
> Sent: segunda-feira, 29 de maio de 2006 22:23
> To: Juha Heinanen
> Cc: OpenSER-users
> Subject: Re: [Users] OpenSER dimensioning. How many calls/sec can
it set
> up?
>
> You are right that you can have 10 servers installed mediaproxy to
> handle 300 concurrent calls. However, it is not a practical way to
> implement a system to support several hundred concurrent calls using
> several servers. As someone said, openser can handle several hundred
> calls, maybe thousand. Comparing to my testing result, I have no idea
> the capacity of openser can handle. Anyone can tell me the real
> capacity that openser can handle?
>
> On 5/29/06, Juha Heinanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > unplug writes:
> >
> > > mediaproxy spends much of the CPU to handle the call compared
with
> > > rtpproxy. From the result that I made in the load test, the
number
> of
> > > concurrent call is much much less than we expected.
> > > maximum concurrent call using mediaproxy (openser & mediaproxy
in the
> > > same server): 30
> > > maximum concurrent call using rtpproxy (openser & rtpproxy in the
> same
> > > server): 60
> >
> > you can distribute mediaproxy to as many host you want. or are you
> > saying that mediaproxy module functions
use_mediaproxy/end_mediaproxy
> > are the bottleneck?
> >
> > -- juha
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
