Re: [Users] nathelper & fax = bug ?

Daniel-Constantin Mierla Thu, 10 Aug 2006 04:53:38 -0700

Did you used that config, or you imported parts in your config? If youcan provide a network trace of the call, maybe we will be able to detectthe error.


Cheers,
Daniel



On 08/10/06 14:39, Pavel D. Kuzin wrote:

tryed with this config.
Reinvite not handled properly.
Can anybody provide example configs?

--
Pavel D.Kuzin
System Administrator
Nodex  ISP
St. Petersburg, Russia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://nodex.ru

----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "Hakan YASTI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 12:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Users] nathelper & fax = bug ?

Hello,

start with:

http://voip-info.org/wiki/view/OpenSER+And+RTPProxy

The re-INVITEs should be handled there.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 08/08/06 09:38, Hakan YASTI wrote:

Hi,

Is there anybody who will share his config file,( or a samleconfiguration ) which is working properly with rtp_proxy ormediaproxy ? ( handle re-INVITEs properly ).

As I see, there are some people have the same problem,like me.
Thanks,

----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "Dmitry Lyubimkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Users] nathelper & fax = bug ?

Hello,

the latest openser should not care about type of media (audio orimage is same for openser). The problem is that you do not forcethe rtpproxy for re-INVITE in your config file, but only forinitial INVITE of the call.


Cheers,
Daniel


On 08/05/06 10:52, Dmitry Lyubimkov wrote:

Connection scheme:
UA         -       router with NAT - OpenSER with nathelper - PSTN
gateway (Cisco AS5350)
(192.168.13.109)   (217.107.59.194)  (62.33.22.14)
(62.33.22.11)

Both incoming and outgoing calls work right. Openser uses thenathelper

module for proxing of rtp stream of NAT UA.
Here is example of SIP messages (call from PSTN through a gateway):

15:37:07.406529 IP 62.33.22.11.54581 > 62.33.22.14.5060: UDP, length
1121

E..}........>!..>!...5...i.hINVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060SIP/2.0

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP  62.33.22.11:5060;x-route-tag="tgrp:ipphone"
From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=A515D068-227D
To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 11:37:07 GMT
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Supported: timer,100rel
Min-SE:  1800
Cisco-Guid: 1688609156-585372123-2332753710-1711444852
User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, COMET, REFER,
SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO
CSeq: 101 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 6
Remote-Party-ID:
<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
Timestamp: 1154691427
Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060>
Expires: 180
Allow-Events: telephone-event
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 316

v=0
o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 4330 9654 IN IP4 62.33.22.11
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 62.33.22.11
t=0 0
m=audio 17088 RTP/AVP 3 18 8 0 4
c=IN IP4 62.33.22.11
a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000
a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000
a=fmtp:18 annexb=yes
a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000
a=fmtp:4 annexa=yes

Nathelper works right and in the message sent to UA you can seealreadyIP address of Openser (62.33.22.14) instead of the address of agateway

(62.33.22.11):

15:37:07.407463 IP 62.33.22.14.5060 > 217.107.59.194.47331: UDP,length

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@..|>!...k;.......n^INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:47331SIP/2.0

Record-Route: <sip:62.33.22.14;lr;ftag=A515D068-227D>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP voapp.ru:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d06.d63c8585.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP  62.33.22.11:5060;x-route-tag="tgrp:ipphone"
From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=A515D068-227D
To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 11:37:07 GMT
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Supported: timer,100rel
Min-SE:  1800
Cisco-Guid: 1688609156-585372123-2332753710-1711444852
User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, COMET, REFER,
SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO
CSeq: 101 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 5
Remote-Party-ID:
<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
Timestamp: 1154691427
Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060>
Expires: 180
Allow-Events: telephone-event
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 334

v=0
o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 4330 9654 IN IP4 62.33.22.11
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 62.33.22.14
t=0 0
m=audio 35858 RTP/AVP 3 18 8 0 4
c=IN IP4 62.33.22.14
a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000
a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000
a=fmtp:18 annexb=yes
a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000
a=fmtp:4 annexa=yes
a=nortpproxy:yes

After some talking the subscriber from PSTN tries to send a fax.
PSTN gateway detects it and sends this message:

15:37:22.512722 IP 62.33.22.11.51655 > 62.33.22.14.5060: UDP, length
1276
E..........z>!..>!..........INVITE
sip:62.33.22.14:5060;from-tag=A515D068-227D;lr SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP  62.33.22.11:5060;x-route-tag="tgrp:ipphone"
From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=A515D068-227D
To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=bbaac0e818284ff5
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 11:37:22 GMT
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Route: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:47331>
Supported: timer,100rel
Min-SE:  1800
Cisco-Guid: 1688609156-585372123-2332753710-1711444852
User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, COMET, REFER,
SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO
CSeq: 102 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 6
Remote-Party-ID:
<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
Timestamp: 1154691442
Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060>
Expires: 180
Allow-Events: telephone-event
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 393

v=0
o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 4330 9656 IN IP4 62.33.22.11
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 62.33.22.11
t=0 0
m=image 17088 udptl t38
c=IN IP4 62.33.22.11
a=T38FaxVersion:0
a=T38MaxBitRate:14400
a=T38FaxFillBitRemoval:0
a=T38FaxTranscodingMMR:0
a=T38FaxTranscodingJBIG:0
a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF
a=T38FaxMaxBuffer:200
a=T38FaxMaxDatagram:72
a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy

Openser processes is and sends to UA:

15:37:22.513017 IP 62.33.22.14.5060 > 217.107.59.194.47331: UDP,length

[EMAIL PROTECTED]@..,>!...k;[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:47331SIP/2.0

Record-Route: <sip:62.33.22.14;lr;ftag=A515D068-227D>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP voapp.ru:5060;branch=z9hG4bKfc06.4b118272.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP  62.33.22.11:5060;x-route-tag="tgrp:ipphone"
From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=A515D068-227D
To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=bbaac0e818284ff5
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 11:37:22 GMT
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Supported: timer,100rel
Min-SE:  1800
Cisco-Guid: 1688609156-585372123-2332753710-1711444852
User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, COMET, REFER,
SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO
CSeq: 102 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 5
Remote-Party-ID:
<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
Timestamp: 1154691442
Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060>
Expires: 180
Allow-Events: telephone-event
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 393

v=0
o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 4330 9656 IN IP4 62.33.22.11
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 62.33.22.11
t=0 0
m=image 17088 udptl t38
c=IN IP4 62.33.22.11
a=T38FaxVersion:0
a=T38MaxBitRate:14400
a=T38FaxFillBitRemoval:0
a=T38FaxTranscodingMMR:0
a=T38FaxTranscodingJBIG:0
a=T38FaxRateManagement:transferredTCF
a=T38FaxMaxBuffer:200
a=T38FaxMaxDatagram:72
a=T38FaxUdpEC:t38UDPRedundancy

As you can see the nathelper module has not worked since the fieldc=IN

IP4 62.33.22.11 has not changed.

Probably it has taken place because m=image instead of m=audio asusual.

As a result of transfer of a fax has not taken place.

If to place UA outside for NAT router all works that once againconfirms

that bug is in the nathelper module.
Questions:

Why the module behaves so? What difference that to proxing (whatbyte stream and in what format)?

How it can be bypassed?

Also that the most interesting - UA refuses to accept T38 andsuggeststo use instead of it G.711 codec and the gateway agrees i.e. inresult

we have audio stream.

Dmitry




_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]

http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] nathelper & fax = bug ?

Reply via email to