-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Klaus Darilion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 31 juli 2006 09:36
Till: Simon Morvan
Kopia: Kerker Staffan; [email protected]
Ämne: Re: [Users] Route-header DNS lookup?
Hi Simon!
Please make a unified diff (cvs diff -u) and post it at the
bugtracker on sourceforge:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=139143&atid=743022
This way it can't get lost under thousands of emails.
regards
klaus
Simon Morvan wrote:
> modified file : modules/rr/loose.c
>
> 2006/7/28, Simon Morvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> after a quick check, the answer is : no
>>
>> this is a quick hack i've made as a workaround. feedback
welcome :)
>>
>> 781,783c781,803
>> < if (set_dst_uri(_m, uri) < 0) {
>> < LOG(L_ERR, "after_loose: Error
while setting
>> dst_uri\n");
>> < return RR_ERROR;
>> ---
>> > if( puri.maddr.s != NULL ){
>> > str builturistr;
>> > char builturi[150];
>> >
>> > memcpy( builturi, "sip:", 4 );
>> > memcpy( builturi+4, puri.maddr.s+6,
>> puri.maddr.len-6 );
>> > builturi[4+puri.maddr.len-6] ='\0';
>> >
>> > LOG( L_ERR, "MaddrURI is %p\n",
builturi );
>> >
>> > builturistr.s = builturi;
>> > builturistr.len = 4+puri.maddr.len-6;
>> >
>> > if (set_dst_uri(_m, &builturistr) < 0) {
>> > LOG(L_ERR, "after_loose:
Error while
>> setting dst_uri\n");
>> > return RR_ERROR;
>> > }
>> >
>> > }else{
>> > if (set_dst_uri(_m, uri) < 0) {
>> > LOG(L_ERR, "after_loose:
Error while
>> setting dst_uri\n");
>> > return RR_ERROR;
>> > }
>>
>>
>> 2006/7/28, Simon Morvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > Is this issue solved in Openser 1.1.0 ?
>> >
>> > 2006/7/7, Simon Morvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > > As Daniel said on the ml thread :
>> > > > it makes sense, we will analyze the implications
and include it
>> on the
>> > > > to-do list.
>> > > >
>> > > > Cheers,
>> > > > Daniel
>> > > Has it been included in the developpement branch yet ?
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Simon.
>> > >
>> > > 2006/7/7, Klaus Darilion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > > > I'm not sure about the maddr parameter. doesn't it
mean that
>> > > > the
>> request
>> > > > should be forwarded to this IP regardsless of the domain? If
>> yes, the
>> > > > DNS lookup can be skipped.
>> > > >
>> > > > regards
>> > > > klaus
>> > > >
>> > > > Kerker Staffan wrote:
>> > > > > hi
>> > > > > i recently bounced into this problem, and i'm not
sure here.
>> > > > > i'm running the openser-devel, with the cacheless
db_mode=3.
>> (works fine btw)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > the record-route header received by the proxy on the other
>> side (SNOM4S), inserts
>> > > > > the domain name (iptel1.ipatl.se) and not the hostname
>> (sip.iptel1.ipatl.se) in the
>> > > > > record-route header, and uses the
maddr=<ip_of_server> with
>> the actual server IP address.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > now, when my client (behind the OpenSER) replies
with an ACK
>> to the incomming OK,
>> > > > > it uses the Route-header recieved in the
RR-header, and sends
>> the ACK to OpenSER. i
>> > > > > then get the following errors in OpenSER.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ---
>> > > > > /usr/local/sbin/openser[3583]: ERROR: mk_proxy: could not
>> resolve hostname: "iptel1.ipatl.se"
>> > > > > /usr/local/sbin/openser[3583]: ERROR: uri2proxy: bad host
>> > > > > name
>> in URI
>>
<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;maddr=172.
>> 28.248.66;transport=udp;lr>
>>
>> > > > > ---
>> > > > >
>> > > > > the ACK i sent look like this:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ---
>> > > > > Request-Line: ACK
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];gruu=6fg9n6dl SIP/2.0
>> > > > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 172.28.248.52:2051;branch=z9hG4bK-d96b1fvapkyn;rport
>> > > > > Route: <sip:172.28.248.10;lr=on;ftag=li9buf1i4p>
>> > > > > Route:
>>
<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;ma
ddr=
>> 172.28.248.66;transport=udp;lr>
>> > > > > From: "Snom 2652" <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=li9buf1i4p
>> > > > > To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=hvseiz7kgb
>> > > > > Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > > > CSeq: 1 ACK
>> > > > > Max-Forwards: 70
>> > > > > Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2051;line=cp4a7ljd>
>> > > > > Content-Length: 0
>> > > > > ---
>> > > > >
>> > > > > as far as i understand, according the rfc 3263, the
>> route-header may contain domain name that
>> > > > > has to be resolved using SRV.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ---
>> > > > > "6 Constructing SIP URIs
>> > > > >
>> > > > > In many cases, an element needs to construct a
SIP URI for
>> inclusion
>> > > > > in a Contact header in a REGISTER, or in a Record-Route
>> header in an
>> > > > > INVITE. According to RFC 3261 [1], these URIs have to
>> > > > > have
>> the
>> > > > > property that they resolve to the specific element that
>> inserted
>> > > > > them. However, if they are constructed with just an IP
>> address, for
>> > > > > example:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > sip:1.2.3.4
>> > > > >
>> > > > > then should the element fail, there is no way
to route the
>> request or
>> > > > > response through a backup.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > SRV provides a way to fix this. Instead of using an IP
>> address, a
>> > > > > domain name that resolves to an SRV record can be used:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > sip:server23.provider.com"
>> > > > > ---
>> > > > >
>> > > > > now, OpenSER only asks DNS for an A record of the name
>> recieved in the route header,
>> > > > > and since that's a domain name, it's
unresolvable, and so the
>> ACK is never sent.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > any hints or clues?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > best regards,
>> > > > > /Staffan Kerker
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Staffan Kerker
>> > > > > Saab Communications, Växjö
>> > > > > p. +46 470 42185
>> > > > > c. +46 705 391365
>> > > > > m. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > Users mailing list
>> > > > > [email protected]
>> > > > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > Users mailing list
>> > > > [email protected]
>> > > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
