Message: 1
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:27:20 +0300
From: OpenSer Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Users] heders in route & failure_route blocks
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
hello,
I want to add Remote-Party-ID header in route block and change it in
failure_route block.
the problem is that after the failure_route block the message sent out
has two Remote-Party-ID headers.
in failure_route I am using remove_hf("Remote-Party-ID")
scenario:
original invite has no Remote-Party-ID header
in route block I use: remove_hf("Remote-Party-ID"); append_rpid_hf("<",
">;party=calling;privacy=full")
in failure_route block I use: remove_hf("Remote-Party-ID");
append_rpid_hf("<", ">;party=calling;privacy=off")
the invite sent out after failure_route block has two Remote-Party-ID
headers, one with privacy=full and another with privacy=off.
is there a way to correct the problem ?
from what I understand the failure_route block works on a copy of the
original message, but the original message has no Remote-Party-ID
header, so why the header from the route block is still visible ?
on the other hand if the header added from the route block is visible
why is it no seen by the remove_hf function ?
thanks,
Razvan Radu
Hi I all so have a similar problem! Is this behavior normal? Is it
possible to have this type of manipulation of the message on the
failure-route?
Thanks in advance,
Jose Silva
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
