Federico Giannici wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 08/21/06 11:42, Gerry wrote:
Good question. I find this restriction very annoying, too.
Sometimes you can get around by checking the things in the forward
route and using setflag() / resetflag() / isflagset() .
Greetings, Gerry.
Federico Giannici schrieb:
Is there a reason why the avp_check() function cannot be used in
the ONREPLY_ROUTE, while it can be used for example in the
FAILURE_ROUTE?
Using OpenSER 1.1.0 from CVS of a few days ago.
this restriction comes because the replies are not processed under
mutex, therefore the access to avps is not synchronized. We look for
a solution to this issue, since it affects other features we want to
have.
So, it shouldn't be usable in the FAILURE_ROUTEs too.
Or not?
from failure route is safe to use since the route is protected by a lock
from TM - a transaction has only one final reply, but have several
provisional replies that can be processed in parallel.
regards,
bogdan
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
