Hi Jose,
I guess the address of the lb is 192.168.1.23, right? I see in receive
ACK no Route hdr or RURI containing this address....
also, are you sure you ACK hits loose_route() ? how the RURI is changed
doesn't reflects a loose_route() but more a static routing into the
script...
regards,
bogdan
Jose Gil Navarrete wrote:
ACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0..
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.1.28:3806;branch=z9hG4bK8010c001d753db11bc2c000f1f72ea95..
Route: <sip:192.168.1.20;lr=on;ftag=20935>..
From: alex <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3806>;tag=20935..
To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=80892cfed653db1187ca000f1f72ea95..
Call-ID: 80892CFE-D653-DB11-BC2B- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 2 ACK..Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3806>..
Max-Forwards: 70..
Content-Length: 0....
And, this is the message that the balancer openser server send:
ACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 SIP/2.0..
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.23;branch=z9hG4bK9411.466dcab6.2..
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.168.1.28:3806;branch=z9hG4bK8010c001d753db11bc2c000f1f72ea95..
Route: <sip:192.168.1.20;lr=on;ftag=20935>..
From: alex <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3806>;tag=20935..
To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=80892cfed653db1187ca000f1f72ea95..
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 2 ACK..Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3806>..
Max-Forwards: 69..
Content-Length: 0....
Regards!
*/Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* escribió:
Hi Jose,
you need both record_route() and loose_route().
regards,
bogdan
Jose Gil Navarrete wrote:
> Hi
> In my server I have:
>
> if (!method=="REGISTER"){
> setflag(1);
> setflag(2);
> record_route();
> }
>
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:36:49 +0300
> From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> >
> Subject: Re: [Users] Problem with module dispatcher
> To: Jose Gil Navarrete
> >
> Cc: [email protected]
>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hello,
>
> do you do record routing on server? The ACK should follow Route
> headers.
>
> A network trace (ngrep, ethereal) will help to identify the
cause for
> the problem.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 09/29/06 00:29, Jose Gil Navarrete wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I have implemented the load balance in mode statefull, I
obtained the
> > next messages:
> >
> > phone1 dispatcher
> > sipserver phone2
> > --------INVITE--------> ----INVITE----------->
> > ----INVITE-------->
> > <----100 TRYING---- <---100 TRYING---- <---100 TRYING----
> > <----180 RINGING-- <---180 RINGING--- <---180 RINGING---
> > <----200 OK---------- <----- 200 OK-------- <---200
> > OK--------
> > -------- ACK --------> --------- ACK -------->
> >
> >
> > You can see that the sipserver never sends ACK message to
> video_phone2.
> > Is this correct?
> >
> > Then I try the next, in the sipserver:
> > if (method =="ACK"){
> > if (!t_relay()) {
> > sl_reply_error();
> > };
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > But the sipserver doesn't send the message ACK at the phone2?
> > Does some body know what it's wrong?
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Do You Yahoo!? La mejor conexión a Internet y *2GB* extra a tu
correo
> por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Users mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!? La mejor conexión a Internet y *2GB* extra a tu correo
por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
