Hello,
I am not sure if it is related to loose route parameter of recrd route
header. Try to play with enable_full_rr parameter:
http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.1.x/rr.html#AEN89
Maybe the logs of CISCO server can give you some hint, if above does not
work.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/08/06 00:36, Harry Harcrow wrote:
I have my SER server running on a Linux machine and I am attempting to
forward some requests to a Cisco SIP server. I have been running
X-lite clients on windows and the same Linux box that the SER server
is running on. I have no problem completing calls between the X-lite
clients OR with either X-lite client calling the Cisco SIP server
directly. However, when I try to make a call from either X-lite client
through the SER server I eventually get timeout methods. I am
trapping those calls and wrote the following route block:
route [5] {
record_route();
forward(uri:host, uri:port);
}
I have tried replacing the forward with send() and t_relay() method
calls, but nothing seems to work.
The header from the X-lite client directly to the Cisco SIP server,
which works is:
INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
166.34.149.xxx:5061;rport;branch=z9hG4bK5963AD09C90F6F3A16F55A271C98F573
From: Harry Harcrow <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5061>;tag=1279481120
To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5061>
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 6254 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 70
Content-Type: application/sdp
User-Agent: X-Lite release 1105d
Content-Length: 313
The header from SER to the Cisco server, which does not work is:
INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
Record-Route: <sip:166.34.149.xxx;ftag=2061592395;lr=on>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 166.34.149.xxx;branch=0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
166.34.149.xxx:5061;rport=5061;branch=z9hG4bK4EA9A90B8CE7CE52BFB69DA431560E57
From: Harry Harcrow <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5061>;tag=2061592395
To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5061>
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 3009 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 16
Content-Type: application/sdp
User-Agent: X-Lite release 1105d
Content-Length: 313
The only thing that I can see different is the record_route record and
an additional Via record.
Does anyone have any idea what I am doing wrong?
Thanks
Harry Harcrow
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
