wok, it seams we have a case. I see two ways of implementing it:
1) using a module parameter (as in Alex patch) to control if a
provisional reply should be automatically send; by default a 100 will be
configure to maintain backward compatibility
modparam("tm","auto_provisional_code",100)
2) having a new function to do relay without any auto provisional
reply (as Klaus suggested).
any opinions?
regards,
bogdan
samuel wrote:
I also vote for Alex's patch with the default value of 1 to keep
backward compatibility.
Samuel.
2006/11/16, Klaus Darilion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> yes, it make sense to have the possibility to send or not a 100 reply.
> The question is : to have a module param as Alex suggested, or to
> control it only from the script (by sending or not a reply).
There would be also another possibility - a new function
t_relay_no100();
Nevertheless I also vote for Alex's patch
regards
klaus
>
> I personally go for 1) as it maintain backward compatibility and may
> simplify the script.
>
> regards,
> bogdan
>
> Alexandr Dubovikov wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 10:10:00AM +0100, samuel wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I vote also for moving it to the config file, so you can choose the
>>> reply message. It's very unconvenient having it coded....
>>>
>>
>> It should be something like in this patch
>>
>>
>> modparam("tm", "trying_replay", 1) - send replay 100 replay on
INVITE.
>> modparam("tm", "trying_replay", 0) - don't send replay on INVITE
>>
>>
>>
>>> Samuel.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Wbr,
>>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
