Thanks Bogdan. I'll have to double-check with them; They may have only meant they wanted the From in E.164 so that Caller ID works correctly. /a
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Hi Alan, > > my advice is to change the PSTN termination since their service is not > RFC compliant - TO header has no use in routing, only the RURI being > used (according to the RFC 3261 ~ 3 years old). > > but to answer to your question, yes that is the proper place and the > mechanism is 95% the same as for FROM hdr. > > regards, > bogdan > > Alan Crosswell wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I see that UAC allows modifying the From header, but I would also like >> to modify the To. This is because an ITSP I will be testing with wants >> the From and To to be written in E.164 form (rewriting the R-URI appears >> not to be good enough) while my internal registrations use a 5-digit >> extension. It looks like uac is the right module for this but it >> appears that it can only modify the From header with uac_replace_from() >> and uac_restore_from(). Would this be the right place to add >> uac_replace_to() and uac_resotre_to() as well? >> >> /a >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
