At 12:53 22/11/2006, Weiter Leiter wrote: ... >Let me compare with cars. ser is the much more fast car then openser, >but with openser I can drive the shortest route whereas with ser I had >to drive weird routes because of missing functions. > > >I believe that naming such functionality would help in this kind of sessions. >(I have my wish list for both, as well.)
Just curious what your "wish list" is? >But I'm still not sure whether there got to be an open feature list and a >roadmap for SER. Actually a roadmap suggestion is in the ottendorf release announcement http://www.iptel.org/new_major_ser_pre_release_ottendorf_is_out_for_testing It is kind of testing balloon -- wondering if people would like to comment on it. >Probably this is >getting better with the select framework in Ottendorf - if only I could >understand it. > > >I find it pretty easy to use, but I join you in denouncing that the >documentation is lagging behind, something that becomes chronic for SER; badly, I have to join you too :-) anyhow, if you occur to have some examples or text to share, that would be just fantastic. Also I recall you once mentioned some fast-usrloc-loading feature in an email I can't find -- could you share with me what this actually is? thanks! -jiri -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
