On 3/30/07, Juha Heinanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cesc writes:
> For one, in my company, we run
> embedded linux AND windows embedded ... but we cannot have the same
> proxy on both platforms, so you have to support two software units
> ... that is work!
why don't you ask your windows software to be ported to linux? then you
would have only one platform to worry about.
-- juha
:)
yes, i know, there is always two faces to a story ...
Look, the "my-work" example was just to show that being flexible and
open is not bad ... of course it takes more effort; this is like all
in life, pros and cons.
Basically, going back to the origins of this thread: I think we should
not bluntly discard new building ways just because one of the outcomes
may be a windows-based openser. Now, if all the porting needed can be
done with the current makefiles ... ok then.
Cesc
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
