At 16:42 23/04/2007, Christian Schlatter wrote:Jiri Kuthan wrote: >Agreed, but I still wouldn't call such a solution "simple and stupid". And the >paper mentions that mysql master-master replication doesn't offer atomicity >and therefor imposes the danger of inconsistent tables. I guess if the authors >would have had access to mysql 5.0 they'd used mysql cluster instead. Don't >get me wrong, I think using a DB cluster for registration state is a valid >approach, it's just more complicated than letting the endpoints register with >all proxies in parallel.
our internal research shows that this does not work as simply as one would wish. regsitration state may be immensly database-intensive. My personal choice is not to put it in database at all. -jiri -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
