Thanks for a quick response.
I'm sorry but I've messed up a little bit.
I've got 2 asterisks and the one I've mentioned is on the same box as
Openser.(Openser 192.168.1.2:5060, Asterisk 192.168.1.2:5065)
Openser acually "record_route" the Invite but it puts there his private address
(192.168.1.2). I presume that's why the user behind different NAT cannot reach
it.
I've tried record_route_preset(""); with public IP of NAT where openser is, and
in that configuration, ACK reaches Openser but it loops and is not forwarded to
192.168.1.2:5065 (Asterisk).RURI in this ACK is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5065", and
Openser listens on port 5060 so I dont understand why it behaves this way.
What do You suggest?
Thanks in advance and sorry once more for this mess.I hope what I write is
still clear.
---- Wiadomość Oryginalna ----
Od: Klaus Darilion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Do: Maciek Kowalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kopia do: [email protected]
Data: 13 czerwca 2007 13:11
Temat: Re: [Users] 200OK Contact header field.
> You are right. If record_route is used the ACK should be sent to openser
> first. Thus, inspect the 200 ok received by the client if the record
> route header present, and inspect the ACK sent from the client if a
> Route header with the content of the record_route header is present.
>
> btw: which client do you use? There are dozens of buggy sip clients out
> there.
>
> regards
> klaus
>
> Maciek Kowalski wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I have a problem with transactions rewrited to asterisk.
> > In my configuration asterisk and openser are behind NAT on a Local
> > Network.(Openser- 192.168.1.2, Asterisk 192.168.1.5)
> > When a User who is behind different NAT(different LAN) sends an Invite
> > which is then rewrited to Asterisk with
> > (rewritehostport("192.168.1.5:5060");) everything works great till asterisk
> > answers with 200OK. In this message the Contact header field is set to
> > "192.168.1.5:5060". When user recieves this 200OK it sends ACK to IPaddress
> > 192.168.1.5 (and since he is behind different NAT..the message goes
> > nowhere).
> > Since the Initial Invite in this transaction is "record_routed" by Openser
> > I thought that the ACK should first go through Openser.
> > Please corect me if Im wrong, and if possible, suggest some solution.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Maciej Kowalski
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
