El Wednesday 08 August 2007 16:40:32 Papadopoulos Georgios escribió: > Hi Inaki, > > Why would you leave out the "4" flag test in nat_uac_test() for the > replies?
Yes, sorry, 4 is valid. > Of course if I leave out the "2" test then my example works (I > have tested it) but I am afraid that this will break some other NATed > senario. And if leave out the "2" test, should I also leave out the "16" > test? In my notes I have: " 16) Is received port (source port of the packet) different from the port specified in the top-most Via header? (this can be used to detect some broken STUN implementations)" Maybe test 16 is just for these broken STUN cases? -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
