Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> Pavel,
> 
> Please correct/enlarge me if there's anything missing/incorrect.
> 
> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the ongoing merge of OpenVZ-based lightweight virtualization into
>> mainline Linux seems to be progressing nicely and I have a few questions
>> about it:
>> - How usable will net namespaces be in 2.6.25? I'm especially interested
>> in assigning a real hardware ethernet device to a VE.
>>   
> 
> I guess some network namespace stuff is NOT completed in upcoming 2.6.25 
> (a lot of stuff done, but not finished)
> 
> For 2.6.26, it will be more-or-less working, with just a few exceptions 
> such as conntracks and IPv6 -- maybe.
> 
>> - Will there be an OpenVZ patch or against 2.6.25?
>>   
> 
> As of now we do not plan to have one. Porting to each mainstream version 
> is too much work to do -- instead we concentrate on
> (1) merging stuff to mainstream
> (2) supporting our stable kernels
> (3) stabilizing 2.6.24 (for now)

2.6.26 will be the next kernel we will port on.

>> - Do you expect net namespace/virtualization work to be completely
>> merged in 2.6.26?
>>   
> 
> As said before, we guess that network namespaces will be more or less 
> useable in 2.6.26.
> 
>> - Which OpenVZ features will not make it to mainline in the 2.6.26
>> timeframe?
>>   
> 
> A lot. Network namespaces is just one piece of a pie.
> 
> To paint in big strokes: resource management and live migration are 
> still on our todo list.
> 
> Resource management: some stuff is in -mm kernel, need to add much more. 
> Will work on that after finishing with net namespaces.

Memory management will change with 2.6.26. API will be kept, but
we'll have a per-ve swapout and (probably) drop privvmpages accounting.

> Live migration: this is much more far perspective, we haven't even 
> started to discuss that seriously on containers@ list.
>> Some of the questions above probably can't be answered without guessing,
>> but a good guess is better than no information and I'd appreciate any
>> status update newer than the OpenVZ blog entry from 2008-01-26.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Carl-Daniel
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@openvz.org
>> https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>   
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to