> I don't quite get it. Is it supposed to be a replacement for 
> vznetaddbr, an addition to it, or is it orthogonal to it? Who 
> and when calls vznetaddbr?

It merges vznetaddbr into vznetcfg, making
vznetaddbr obsolete.

- Dietmar


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to