Hi Alexander! Thursday 25, at 12:09:50 AM you wrote:
> Suno Ano schreef: > > Jure> ways, but at the end we concluded that there are too many > > Jure> unknowns still and that the technology is not yet mature enough > > Jure> to run in production. > > > > I agree however, that using both together is quite uncharted territory > > -- I am very interested in this kind of setup, both, from a technical > > point of view and because we are looking for some setup that combines > > the ability to store huge amounts of data and makes use of OpenVZ for > > all kinds of services around this data. > > Same for me. I tried using both, but it turned out to be quite difficult > to combine GlusterFS and OpenVZ. (well, not impossible, just there > wasn't a section in the manual dealing with the issues you come across ;)). What was the difficult in OpenVZ with GlusterFS? /me using both on developer nodes and all works fine - ovz support virtualized fuse mounts inside VE (gluster works on top of fuse module). > > Can't give any specifics anymore though, it was a long time ago that I > tried it. I just remember giving up... Gluster offers more flexible solution rather than simple nfs mount ;) Especially when 2.1.x will be ready (due native support nfs protocol through booster library). > > Alexander > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- WBR et al.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
