Hi! > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2010 16:54 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [Users] Re: I/O priorities question > > Zitat von Aleksandar Ivanisevic <[email protected]>: > > > [email protected] writes: > > > >> Zitat von Aleksandar Ivanisevic <[email protected]>: > >> > >>> > >>> Anyone? > >>> > >>> Aleksandar Ivanisevic > >>> <[email protected]> writes: > >>> > >>>> http://wiki.openvz.org/I/O_priorities_for_containers > >>>> > >>>> What priority is the host node? How do those priorities relate to > >>>> ionice's priorities? > >>>> > >>>> My empirical research showed that even idle priority disk intensive > >>>> task in a HN saturates a IOPRIO=7 container. Is that right? > >>>> > >> > >> As far as i know the IOPRIO is only relevant for the container not > >> for the HN because the HN does all IO for the containers so there is > >> no useful setting for the HN anyway. > > > > I know that there is no setting, but what would be the I/O priority of > > the processes started in HN (VEID=0) in relation to the process > > started in VEID>0? > > You should not start any "worker" process at the HN. The IO at the HN is > not subject to any rate limit from the OpenVZ tools as far as i know. The > IOPRIO for the container is used as relative value to divide the IO not > consumed by the HN itself to the containers. > [...]
Would using ionice and nice on the hardware node help in this case? Regards, Dennis Benzinger _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
