Hello list,
are there conclusions on this "survey" ?
we are please to move from our openVZ6 to Vz7 , but still questionning :
1) will it be possible to backup CTs , regarding
https://forum.openvz.org/index.php?t=msg&th=13160&start=0 it is
challenging !?
2) as an academic institution, we cannot move to commercial virtuozzo7
(yet), will we loose features by moving from vz6 to Vz7 (other than 1)
backup !) , is https://openvz.org/Comparison up2date ?
3) what is the core of CTs in Vz7 , proxmox 4 uses LXC, others uses
docker or whatever ... I am curious to know on what technology are based
CTs in openvz 7 ?
4) what is the "market share" of virtuozzo7 and Vz7 , is there an
independant study or internal stats featuring virtualization solutions
usage over ISPs, hosting companies and other institutions ? what is the
place of virtuozzo7 and/or community Vz7 in this world ?
Regards .
Le 12/06/2017 à 09:44, Narcis Garcia a écrit :
From the point of view of support, comparing to LXC and Xen, I see
OpenVZ6 as the best professionally supported solution for containers in
a standard operating system.
LXC improves year to year, and supports more architectures, but OpenVZ6
has been allways more mature and better prepared for production in any
x86 scenario, thanks to its development & support team.
The commercial support is very important to recommend it to all
companies using this containers solution, to allow Odin Inc. to maintain
this level of quality and compatibility.
El 11/06/17 a les 23:02, jjs - mainphrame ha escrit:
I campaigned to bring Virtuozzo Linux containers to my company, and used
them from 2010-2013, when I left. Naturally I loved the killer features
like vzfs, live migration, the web management console, etc. The tech
support guys in Moscow were top notch, and on one occasion tracked down
a show stopper kernel bug that came from upstream RHEL.
During that time, I also continued to use openvz for side jobs, and
while not quite as nifty as the commercial version, it was still very
stable and capable.
When ovz 7 came out, I started using the beta versions for my own
internal servers - postfix, apache, mysql, bind. Originally it was
installed on top of Centos 7, then vzlinux became a distro on it's own.
I've been very happy with it, and it's been stable here, with the
exception of a few problems which have since been sorted out.
I also have lxc and lxd containers running here, and I find the ovz
containers to be better in my experience, though lxd has been making
great strides to catch up.
As far as the VMs, I haven't ever used the ovz variety. I've looked at
the docs for ovz VMs, and made a few fledgling attempts, but frankly,
Virtualbox is so quick and easy, a no brainer to set up a VM on the odd
occasion that I need to set one up, and quick and easy always wins.
I have not have an opportunity to use the commercial version of vzlinux,
but based on my experience with ovz 7, and the excellent tech support I
remember from the my time using the Virtuozzo Linux containers, I would
definitely recommend it to any employer looking to virtualize their
Linux infrastructure in future.
Jake
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:46 AM, Vasily Averin <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear OpenVZ users,
could you please share your feedback on Vz7?
How do you perceive Virtuozzo VMs vs others (Oracle or KVM VMs) ?
How do you perceive Virtuozzo Containers vs others (Oracle
containers, Docker containers, etc) ?
Thank you,
Vasily Averin
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
<https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
