> Subject: Re: [Users] Host missing cpuFlags
> From: mbu...@redhat.com
> To: ih...@redhat.com
> CC: cybertimber2...@hotmail.com; users@ovirt.org; 
> vdsm-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 07:52:30 -0400
> 
> On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 14:34 +0300, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > On 05/04/2012 02:26 PM, Nicholas Kesick wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >  > Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 08:14:14 +0300
> > >  > From: ih...@redhat.com
> > >  > To: cybertimber2...@hotmail.com
> > >  > CC: users@ovirt.org
> > >  > Subject: Re: [Users] Host missing cpuFlags
> > >  >
> > >  > On 05/04/2012 06:49 AM, Nicholas Kesick wrote:
> > >  > > I managed to get a host successfully added into oVirt Manager 
> > > (Fedora16
> > >  > > minimum install, then used the wiki RPM install method), but the last
> > >  > > event reports "Host <hostname> moved to Non-operational state as host
> > >  > > does not meet the cluster's minimum CPU level. Missing CPU features:
> > >  > > CpuFlags"
> > >  > >
> > >  > > Can anyone shine some light on the problem? The CPU does support
> > >  > > virtualization... and as far as I can tell from cat /proc/cpuinfo 
> > > does
> > >  > > does have cpu flags.
> > >  > > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr *pae* mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca 
> > > cmov
> > >  > > pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx 
> > > lm
> > >  > > constant_tsc pebs bts nopl pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl *vmx* est cid 
> > > cx16
> > >  > > xtpr pdcm lahf_lm tpr_shadow
> > >  >
> > >  > what is the cpu level of the cluster?
> > >  > what cluster compatibility level?
> > >  > what does vdsClient -s 0 getVdsCaps shows for cpu flags?
> > > I didn't even know there was a setting for that until now. This probably
> > > explains it.
> > > CPU Level of cluster: Intel Conroe Family
> > > Cluster Compatibility Level: 3.0 (?)
> > > Output of vdsClient -S - getVdsCaps:
> > > vdsClient -s 0 getVdsCaps
> > > HBAInventory = {'iSCSI': [{'InitiatorName':
> > > 'iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:238a26703858'}], 'FC': []}
> > > ISCSIInitiatorName = iqn.1994-05.com.redhat:238a26703858
> > > bondings = {'bond4': {'hwaddr': '00:00:00:00:00:00', 'cfg': {},
> > > 'netmask': '', 'addr': '', 'slaves': []}, 'bond0': {'hwaddr':
> > > '00:00:00:00:00:00', 'cfg': {}, 'netmask': '', 'addr': '', 'slaves':
> > > []}, 'bond1': {'hwaddr': '00:00:00:00:00:00', 'cfg': {}, 'netmask': '',
> > > 'addr': '', 'slaves': []}, 'bond2': {'hwaddr': '00:00:00:00:00:00',
> > > 'cfg': {}, 'netmask': '', 'addr': '', 'slaves': []}, 'bond3': {'hwaddr':
> > > '00:00:00:00:00:00', 'cfg': {}, 'netmask': '', 'addr': '', 'slaves': []}}
> > > clusterLevels = ['3.0']
> > > cpuCores = 2
> > > cpuFlags =
> > > fpu,vme,de,pse,tsc,msr,pae,mce,cx8,apic,sep,mtrr,pge,mca,cmov,pat,pse36,clflush,dts,acpi,mmx,fxsr,sse,sse2,ss,ht,tm,pbe,syscall,nx,lm,constant_tsc,pebs,bts,nopl,pni,dtes64,monitor,ds_cpl,vmx,est,cid,cx16,xtpr,pdcm,lahf_lm,tpr_shadow,model_486,model_pentium,model_pentium2,model_pentium3,model_pentiumpro,model_qemu32,model_coreduo,model_Opteron_G1
> > 
> > either libvirt isn't reporting this, or there is a vdsm bug filtering it 
> > erroneously.
> > cc-ing vdsm-devel
> 
> I may be completely off here, but isn't this the NX bit problem?  You
> need to have the NX bit set in BIOS for the cpu_family flag to be set
> correctly.  
> 
> Mike
> 

Mike,
I see NX in the cpuFlags list: ...syscall,nx,lm,... is that you are reffering 
to?

Though I think it boils down to the fact that what I'm running it on is a 
Pentium D, which is the NetBurst architecture. NetBurst is below Conroe, so it 
would fail to meet the cluster compatibility level of Conroe.

- Nick

                                          
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to