Ayal, did you see something in the code that made you want me to try the sym-link to /etc/rhev-hypervisor-release?Mike, is there any harm in linking it? - Nick > Subject: Re: [Users] Adding oVirt Node Fails > From: mbu...@redhat.com > To: aba...@redhat.com > CC: cybertimber2...@hotmail.com; users@ovirt.org > Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 21:26:08 -0400 > > On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 16:39 -0400, Ayal Baron wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > > > Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 12:29:20 +0300 > > > > From: dfedi...@redhat.com > > > > To: cybertimber2...@hotmail.com > > > > CC: mbu...@redhat.com; users@ovirt.org > > > > Subject: Re: [Users] Adding oVirt Node Fails > > > > > > > > On 04/05/12 02:49, Nicholas Kesick wrote: > > > > > Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:22:24 DEBUG instCert: try to delete old > > > > > certificates > > > > > Fri, 27 Apr 2012 05:22:24 DEBUG instCert: failed. > > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > > > > File "/usr/share/vdsm-reg/deployUtil.py", line 1133, in instCert > > > > > File "/usr/share/vdsm-reg/deployUtil.py", line 1098, in > > > > > pkiCleanup > > > > > OSError: [Errno 16] Device or resource busy: > > > > > '/etc/pki/vdsm/certs/cacert.pem' > > > > > > > > > > > > Nicholas, > > > > I think I got it; > > > > Please check if this file exists: '/etc/rhev-hypervisor-release'. > > > > If not, try to create a sym-link in this name to > > > > /etc/system-release, > > > > and restart vdsm-reg service. > > No, /etc/rhev-hypervisor-release should not exist. It doesn't have to. > We went through significant effort before the 3.0 release making sure > that vdsm used /etc/ovirt-node-image-release for determining if the > machine is ovirt-node based or not. > > There should not be any need for anything that says "rhev" in > ovirt-node. > > Mike > > > > > > > > > Also please provide the rpm information for vdsm-reg and vdsm as > > > > well. > > > > -- > > > > > > > > /d > > > > > > > > "Common sense is not so common." --Voltaire, Dictionnaire > > > > Philosophique (1764) > > > > > > Just to make sure I do it right, can you specify which you wanted > > > done on the node, and which you wanted on the manager? I have the > > > feeling you wanted it all done on the node. > > > > you are correct, all on node. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Users mailing list > > > Users@ovirt.org > > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > Users@ovirt.org > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users