BTW, if Dell try for a "not supported" again, you can point them to
http://en.community.dell.com/techcenter/b/techcenter/archive/2013/01/03/announcing-the-release-of-red-hat-enterprise-rhev-3-1-on-dell-poweredge-servers.aspx

They have a similar announcement for 3.0:
http://en.community.dell.com/techcenter/b/techcenter/archive/2012/07/13/red-hat-enterprise-virtualization-rhev-3-0-works-on-dell-poweredge-servers.aspx
 though worded slightly differently


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jonathan Horne" <jho...@skopos.us>
> To: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Thursday, 3 January, 2013 6:00:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] ovirt and EqualLogic iSCSI SAN
> 
> well, my point for asking is, so far on my EQ san i never see more
> than 1
> session per ovirt node, and the point of the EQ driver is so that
> each
> iscsi-client can create multiple iscsi sessions per LUN as needed.
> 
> myself, I'm using M620 blades for my nodes, and its connected to the
> backplane switches which are stacked.  if i use the standard EQ
> config,
> both interfaces on the iscsi switch (in the case of my M620, p3p1 and
> p3p2) would have their own separate IP address, and the EQ driver
> would
> normally cause both interfaces to establish iscsi sessions to the
> LUN.
> but when i tried this, only 1 IP address logged in, and that leaves
> me
> with a single point of failure scenario which for us isn't acceptable
> at
> this time.
> 
> so my current config is bonded p3p1 and p3p2 in LACP, and this is
> what i
> rely on for fault tolerant connections to the EQ san.  but if you put
> a
> call into to Dell/EQ for performance issues, the first thing they
> will
> tell you the problem is, is the lack of the EQ driver and the use of
> LACP
> to access the EQ.
> 
> and for now, this is working, but just due to the nature of the EQ
> san,
> its not the optimal.  RHEV is *not* on the supported OS list for
> this, so
> Dell just scratch their head while trying to tell me what to do to
> make
> this work as best as it can for me. needless to say when dell comes
> out
> next week to validate the deployment probably the only thing that
> will
> pass is the switch config :)
> 
> maybe someday ill upgrade from MyFirstSan to a bigboy san heheehh
> *wink*
> 
> 
> 
> On 1/3/13 9:32 AM, "Dan Yasny" <dya...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> >EQL storage works just fine as a normal iscsi SAN, using the normal
> >iscsiadm commands. The hitkit is doing things differently, and
> >that's not
> >necessarily the right thing to do. oVirt is trying to keep things
> >generic, using standard commands, standard daemons and access paths
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Jonathan Horne" <jho...@skopos.us>
> >> To: users@ovirt.org
> >> Sent: Thursday, 3 January, 2013 5:28:44 PM
> >> Subject: [Users] ovirt and EqualLogic iSCSI SAN
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> i have had to abandon (hopefully just for now) getting my ovirt
> >> nodes
> >> properly setup with my equal logic iscsi SAN. EQ has a special
> >> iscsi
> >> driver, and it appears that ovirt uses the regular iscsi commands
> >> to
> >> connect to the storage, circumventing the features of the EQ
> >> driver.
> >>
> >>
> >> unless I'm wrong, which i totally could be.
> >>
> >>
> >> in case I'm not, will there ever be a chance of supporting the EQ
> >> iscsi features, and if there is a chance, how can i help?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ps-- in case someone asks, here is the basic difference between a
> >> normal linux iscsi command set, and the equallogic iscsi command
> >> set:
> >>
> >>
> >> normal linux:
> >> iscsiadm -m discovery -t sendtargets -p IPADDRESS
> >> iscsiadm -m node -T FULLIQN -p IPADDRESS -l
> >> fdisk /dev/yaymydevice
> >>
> >>
> >> equallogic:
> >> iscsiadm -m discovery -t sendtargets -p IPADDRESS
> >> ehcmcli login --target FULLIQN --portal IPADDRESS
> >> which will then present you your device, such as
> >> /dev/eql/yaymydeviceÅ 
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> Jonathan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient,
> >> please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of
> >> the
> >> mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail
> >> shall
> >> not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless
> >> pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative
> >> expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Users mailing list
> >> Users@ovirt.org
> >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>
> >
> >--
> >
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Dan Yasny
> >Red Hat Israel
> >+972 9769 2280
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the
> mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall
> not operate to bind SKOPOS to any order or other contract unless
> pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative
> expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 

-- 



Regards, 

Dan Yasny 
Red Hat Israel 
+972 9769 2280
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to