On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 03:59:27PM +0100, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote: > On 05.03.2013 13:49, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:32:31PM +0100, Patrick Hurrelmann wrote: > >> On 05.03.2013 11:14, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > >> <snip> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> My version of vdsm as stated by Dreyou: > >>>>>> v 4.10.0-0.46 (.15), builded from > >>>>>> b59c8430b2a511bcea3bc1a954eee4ca1c0f4861 (branch ovirt-3.1) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I can't see that Ia241b09c96fa16441ba9421f61a2f9a417f0d978 was merged > >>>>>> to > >>>>>> 3.1 Branch? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I applied that patch locally and restarted vdsmd but this does not > >>>>>> change anything. Supported cpu is still as low as Conroe instead of > >>>>>> Nehalem. Or is there more to do than patching libvirtvm.py? > >>>>> > >>>>> What is libvirt's opinion about your cpu compatibility? > >>>>> > >>>>> virsh -r cpu-compare <(echo '<cpu > >>>>> match="minimum"><model>Nehalem</model><vendor>Intel</vendor></cpu>') > >>>>> > >>>>> If you do not get "Host CPU is a superset of CPU described in bla", then > >>>>> the problem is within libvirt. > >>>>> > >>>>> Dan. > >>>> > >>>> Hi Dan, > >>>> > >>>> virsh -r cpu-compare <(echo '<cpu > >>>> match="minimum"><model>Nehalem</model><vendor>Intel</vendor></cpu>') > >>>> Host CPU is a superset of CPU described in /dev/fd/63 > >>>> > >>>> So libvirt obviously is fine. Something different would have surprised > >>>> my as virsh capabilities seemed correct anyway. > >>> > >>> So maybe, just maybe, libvirt has changed their cpu_map, a map that > >>> ovirt-3.1 had a bug reading. > >>> > >>> Would you care to apply http://gerrit.ovirt.org/5035 to see if this is > >>> it? > >>> > >>> Dan. > >> > >> Hi Dan, > >> > >> success! Applying that patch made the cpu recognition work again. The > >> cpu type in admin portal shows again as Nehalem. Output from getVdsCaps: > >> > >> cpuCores = 4 > >> cpuFlags = fpu,vme,de,pse,tsc,msr,pae,mce,cx8,apic,sep,mtrr,pge, > >> mca,cmov,pat,pse36,clflush,dts,acpi,mmx,fxsr,sse,sse2, > >> ss,ht,tm,pbe,syscall,nx,rdtscp,lm,constant_tsc, > >> arch_perfmon,pebs,bts,rep_good,xtopology,nonstop_tsc, > >> aperfmperf,pni,dtes64,monitor,ds_cpl,vmx,smx,est,tm2, > >> ssse3,cx16,xtpr,pdcm,sse4_1,sse4_2,popcnt,lahf_lm,ida, > >> dts,tpr_shadow,vnmi,flexpriority,ept,vpid,model_Nehalem, > >> model_Conroe,model_coreduo,model_core2duo,model_Penryn, > >> model_n270 > >> cpuModel = Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3430 @ 2.40GHz > >> cpuSockets = 1 > >> cpuSpeed = 2393.769 > >> > >> > >> I compared libvirt's cpu_map.xml on both Centos 6.3 and CentOS 6.4 and > >> indeed they do differ in large portions. So this patch should probably > >> be merged to 3.1 branch? I will contact Dreyou and request that this > >> patch will also be included in his builds. I guess otherwise there will > >> be quite some fallout after people start picking CentOS 6.4 for oVirt 3.1. > >> > >> Thanks again and best regards > > > > Thank you for reporting this issue and verifying its fix. > > > > I'm not completely sure that we should keep maintaining the ovirt-3.1 > > branch upstream - but a build destined for el6.4 must have it. > > > > If you believe we should release a fix version for 3.1, please verify > > that http://gerrit.ovirt.org/12723 has no ill effects. > > > > Dan. > > I did none additional tests and the new CentOS 6.4 host failed start or > migrate any vm. It always boils down to: > > Thread-43::ERROR::2013-03-07 > 15:02:51,950::task::853::TaskManager.Task::(_setError) > Task=`52a9f96f-3dfd-4bcf-8d7a-db14e650b4c1`::Unexpected error > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 861, in _run > return fn(*args, **kargs) > File "/usr/share/vdsm/logUtils.py", line 38, in wrapper > res = f(*args, **kwargs) > File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 2551, in getVolumeSize > apparentsize = str(volume.Volume.getVSize(sdUUID, imgUUID, volUUID, > bs=1)) > File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/volume.py", line 283, in getVSize > return mysd.getVolumeClass().getVSize(mysd, imgUUID, volUUID, bs) > File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/blockVolume.py", line 101, in getVSize > return int(int(lvm.getLV(sdobj.sdUUID, volUUID).size) / bs) > File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/lvm.py", line 772, in getLV > lv = _lvminfo.getLv(vgName, lvName) > File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/lvm.py", line 567, in getLv > lvs = self._reloadlvs(vgName) > File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/lvm.py", line 419, in _reloadlvs > self._lvs.pop((vgName, lvName), None) > File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/contextlib.py", line 34, in __exit__ > self.gen.throw(type, value, traceback) > File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/misc.py", line 1219, in acquireContext > yield self > File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/lvm.py", line 404, in _reloadlvs > lv = makeLV(*fields) > File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/lvm.py", line 218, in makeLV > attrs = _attr2NamedTuple(args[LV._fields.index("attr")], > LV_ATTR_BITS, "LV_ATTR") > File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/lvm.py", line 188, in _attr2NamedTuple > attrs = Attrs(*values) > TypeError: __new__() takes exactly 9 arguments (10 given) > > and followed by: > > Thread-43::ERROR::2013-03-07 > 15:02:51,987::dispatcher::69::Storage.Dispatcher.Protect::(run) > __new__() takes exactly 9 arguments (10 given) > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/dispatcher.py", line 61, in run > result = ctask.prepare(self.func, *args, **kwargs) > File "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/task.py", line 1164, in prepare > raise self.error > TypeError: __new__() takes exactly 9 arguments (10 given) > Thread-43::DEBUG::2013-03-07 > 15:02:51,987::vm::580::vm.Vm::(_startUnderlyingVm) > vmId=`7db86f12-8c57-4d2b-a853-a6fd6f7ee82d`::_ongoingCreations released > Thread-43::ERROR::2013-03-07 > 15:02:51,987::vm::604::vm.Vm::(_startUnderlyingVm) > vmId=`7db86f12-8c57-4d2b-a853-a6fd6f7ee82d`::The vm start process failed > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/share/vdsm/vm.py", line 570, in _startUnderlyingVm > self._run() > File "/usr/share/vdsm/libvirtvm.py", line 1289, in _run > devices = self.buildConfDevices() > File "/usr/share/vdsm/vm.py", line 431, in buildConfDevices > self._normalizeVdsmImg(drv) > File "/usr/share/vdsm/vm.py", line 358, in _normalizeVdsmImg > drv['truesize'] = res['truesize'] > KeyError: 'truesize' > > In webadmin the start and migrate operations fail with 'truesize'. > > I could find BZ#876958 which has the very same error. So I tried to > apply patch http://gerrit.ovirt.org/9317. I had to apply it manually > (guess patch would need a rebase for 3.1), but it works.
Thanks for the report. I've made a public backport for this in http://gerrit.ovirt.org/12836/ and would ask you again to tick that it is verified by you. > > I now can start new virtual machines successfully on a CentOS 6.4 / > oVirt 3.1 host. Migration of vm from CentOS 6.3 hosts work, but not the > other way around. Migration from 6.4 to 6.3 fails: > > Thread-1296::ERROR::2013-03-07 15:55:24,845::vm::176::vm.Vm::(_recover) > vmId=`c978cbf8-6b4d-4d6f-9435-480d9fed31c4`::internal error Process > exited while reading console log output: Supported machines are: > pc RHEL 6.3.0 PC (alias of rhel6.3.0) > rhel6.3.0 RHEL 6.3.0 PC (default) > rhel6.2.0 RHEL 6.2.0 PC > rhel6.1.0 RHEL 6.1.0 PC > rhel6.0.0 RHEL 6.0.0 PC > rhel5.5.0 RHEL 5.5.0 PC > rhel5.4.4 RHEL 5.4.4 PC > rhel5.4.0 RHEL 5.4.0 PC > > Thread-1296::ERROR::2013-03-07 15:55:24,988::vm::240::vm.Vm::(run) > vmId=`c978cbf8-6b4d-4d6f-9435-480d9fed31c4`::Failed to migrate > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/share/vdsm/vm.py", line 223, in run > self._startUnderlyingMigration() > File "/usr/share/vdsm/libvirtvm.py", line 451, in > _startUnderlyingMigration > None, maxBandwidth) > File "/usr/share/vdsm/libvirtvm.py", line 491, in f > ret = attr(*args, **kwargs) > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/vdsm/libvirtconnection.py", > line 82, in wrapper > ret = f(*args, **kwargs) > File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 1178, in > migrateToURI2 > if ret == -1: raise libvirtError ('virDomainMigrateToURI2() failed', > dom=self) > libvirtError: internal error Process exited while reading console log > output: Supported machines are: > pc RHEL 6.3.0 PC (alias of rhel6.3.0) > rhel6.3.0 RHEL 6.3.0 PC (default) > rhel6.2.0 RHEL 6.2.0 PC > rhel6.1.0 RHEL 6.1.0 PC > rhel6.0.0 RHEL 6.0.0 PC > rhel5.5.0 RHEL 5.5.0 PC > rhel5.4.4 RHEL 5.4.4 PC > rhel5.4.0 RHEL 5.4.0 PC > > But I guess this is fine and migration from higher host version to a > lower version is probably not supported, right? Well, I suppose that qemu would allow migration if you begine with a a *guest* of version rhel6.3.0. Please try it out. Dan. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
