On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 11:41 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:07 PM, René Koch (ovido) wrote:

> Two questions:
> 
> 1) On my all-in-one system with f18 + oVirt stable 3.2.1 I have
> ovirt-engine-3.2.1-1.fc18.noarch
> ovirt-engine-cli-3.2.0.11-1.fc18.noarch
> 
> when I run ovirt-shell I get
> 
> >>> connected to oVirt manager 3.2.0.0 <<<
> 
> so this banner refers to ovirt-shell itself and not the engine itself,
> I presume... correct?


It seems that this banner does reflect the oVirt/RHEV major version.
Connecting to RHEV 3.1 with ovirt-shell (from oVirt 3.2 package) gives
me the following banner:

 ==========================================
 >>> connected to oVirt manager 3.1.0.0 <<<
 ==========================================

oVirt 3.2.1 says "connected to oVirt manager 3.2.0.0"


> 
> 2) If I have one VM with one snapshot the beginning of the output is:
> 
> ==========================================
>  >>> connected to oVirt manager 3.2.0.0 <<<
>  ==========================================
> 
> 
> id             : f916e1a3-13bc-43e8-8187-65a1ab9163c8
> description    : Active VM
> date           : 2013-03-01T00:31:20.898+01:00
> snapshot_status: ok
> type           : active
> 
> id                           : 5a623a18-11eb-455b-9791-680795a23f8e
> description                  : test
> date                         : 2013-03-22T01:08:50.038+01:00
> ...
> 
> Then I create another snapshot and I get:
> 
> ==========================================
>  >>> connected to oVirt manager 3.2.0.0 <<<
>  ==========================================
> 
> 
> id             : c714182a-46e2-4a85-b7db-1b74542b202c
> description    : Active VM
> date           : 2013-03-01T00:31:20.898+01:00
> snapshot_status: ok
> type           : active
> 
> id                           : 5a623a18-11eb-455b-9791-680795a23f8e
> description                  : test
> date                         : 2013-03-22T01:08:50.038+01:00
> 
> ...
> 
> id                           : f916e1a3-13bc-43e8-8187-65a1ab9163c8
> description                  : test2
> date                         : 2013-03-23T11:27:21.931+01:00
> snapshot_status              : ok
> ...
> 
> If the first "id" value in first 5 lines refers to VM itself, why does
> it change between first run with one snapshot
> (value  f916e1a3-13bc-43e8-8187-65a1ab9163c8)
> and the second run
> (value c714182a-46e2-4a85-b7db-1b74542b202c)
> 
> btw the id of first run matches the id "assigned" to the second
> snapshot in second run (test2)?????


Sorry, I've no idea :(

> 
> Thanks,
> Gianluca

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to