Dne 1.5.2013 17:25, Sven Knohsalla napsal(a):
Hi Jakub,
I assume the solution you are searching for is something GlusterFS can serve
for example:
http://www.gluster.org/about/
Best, Sven.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von
Jonathan Horne
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. Mai 2013 17:16
An: Jakub Bittner; [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [Users] Fault tolerant storage
I would be surprised if you could do that without your users noticing.
It seems like you would be better served to have each storage domain on a RAID
array and rely on the hardware tools of the RAID to handle disk failure
tolerance.
Cheers,
jonathan
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Jakub Bittner
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 9:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Users] Fault tolerant storage
Hi,
would it be possible in near future to use for example 2 attached DATA storage
(iSCSi, or so) as fault tolerant storage?
I mean I have two data storage connected to data center and they include
exactly same data and my VMs runs from one and all changes are mirrored to
second like RAID 1 and if one storage fails everything switch to second storage
without user notice?
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
________________________________
This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery.
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind SKOPOS to
any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi,
thank you for replies.
Sven:
I know Gluster. I am using it since 2009 in production but the problem
is that many organisations and users already have Storage arrays
(SAN,NAS,..) and migrating to Gluster is not possible or reliable.
While I have 2 storage arrays I would like to use them like network raid
1. Also the combination of more storage types would be super cool (NFS
+ ISCSI) or so.
Jonathan:
Yes, I can rely on disk arrays for hdd fault tolerance, but there are
more points of failure than disks (network, ram, cpu, water in rack and
so).
To be clear, I know, I can manage fault tolerance by hardware, but it is
more expensive
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
