Il 23/09/2013 14:11, Mike Burns ha scritto: > On 09/23/2013 03:51 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >> Il 17/09/2013 00:48, Mike Burns ha scritto: >>> On 09/16/2013 06:41 PM, H. Haven Liu wrote: >>>> Thanks for the discussion. But for those of us that are not using >>>> gluster, but just good ol' NFS, is updating simply "yum update >>>> ovirt-*"? >>>> >>> >>> No, yum update won't upgrade ovirt packages. >>> >>> If you're running on Fedora, you need to update Fedora first, then run >>> engine-upgrade. If you're on EL6, a simple engine-upgrade should work. >>> >>> Ofer, any other gotchas? Can you have someone create a 3.2 to 3.3 upgrade >>> page on the wiki? >> >> Here you can find the test results of upgrading from Fedora 18 / oVirt 3.2 >> to Fedora 19 oVirt 3.3: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005950 >> >> I'm a bit short on time, but I can try to find some for creating that page. >> Any preference on the URL / page name? > > Previous ones exist like this: > > http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.0_to_3.1_upgrade > http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.1_to_3.2_upgrade > > so this would make sense: > > http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.2_to_3.2_upgrade
Created http://www.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.2_to_3.3_upgrade >> >> >> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Mike >>> >>>> On Sep 16, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Mike Burns <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 09/16/2013 05:26 PM, Joop wrote: >>>>>> Mike Burns wrote: >>>>>>> On 09/16/2013 04:30 PM, Joop wrote: >>>>>>>> H. Haven Liu wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is there any recommended procedure for updating from 3.2 to >>>>>>>>> 3.3 (namely on a CentOS 6.4 system), or anything one should >>>>>>>>> be careful when doing such update? >>>>>>>> Be careful when you use glusterfs, not nfs over glusterfs, >>>>>>>> but read the release-notes. It should have something to say >>>>>>>> about glusterfs domain not (yet) working on el6. Saw a small >>>>>>>> discussion on irc just yet and my two cents are that you >>>>>>>> can't add el6 support to ovirt in release 3.2 and then >>>>>>>> withdraw it with 3.3 and say well just wait for >>>>>>>> Centos/Rhel-6.5. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We haven't removed any functionality in 3.3. In 3.2, we added >>>>>>> support for gluster domains through a POSIXFS interface. In >>>>>>> 3.3, we're adding a feature where we support gluster natively. >>>>>>> This works in Fedora, but is not available on EL6. The POSIXFS >>>>>>> option still exists >>>>>> You're right but what about users who want to use the (much) >>>>>> improved speed of the gluster domain over the POSIXFS interface? >>>>>> They are left out or they should move to Fed19 which I would do >>>>>> but I need to convince a couple of other people as well and they >>>>>> aren't going to agree. >>>>> >>>>> I understand the complaint, honestly. And we're working on a >>>>> solution so that it will work for people on EL6. >>>>> >>>>> From the perspective of whether we should release with this >>>>> limitation or not, I'd point out that by not releasing, we'd be >>>>> preventing everyone from using any of the new features until we get >>>>> a solution for this. I'd rather release and make it available for >>>>> everyone now and say that the Gluster domain for EL6 will come as >>>>> soon as we can work out the dependency issues. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The kernel can come from elrepo so that is not a burden for >>>>>>>> the ovirt team, qemu/libvirt should be build by the ovirt >>>>>>>> team and be available from the ovirt repo. At the moment I >>>>>>>> also see/saw Jboss-7.1.1 qemu/libvirt wouldn't be the first >>>>>>>> packages to be in the ovirt-repo which are also in the main >>>>>>>> distributions repos. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We're trying to work out a way to do this in a consistent >>>>>>> manner going forward. We should have a solution soon, but in >>>>>>> the meantime, the other functionality and features should work >>>>>>> on both Fedora and EL6. >>>>>> Thanks for the clarification and I'm waiting eagerly for >>>>>> what/when the solution comes out. >>>>> >>>>> There have been a few considerations for solving this including >>>>> rebuilding pure upstream or fedora packages for EL6. That is a >>>>> risky solution in my mind since there are rather large deltas >>>>> between Fedora and EL6. We're looking at whether we can have a >>>>> "virt-preview" type of repo for EL6 similar to what exists today >>>>> for Fedora[1]. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Mike >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_Preview_Repository >>>>>> >>>>>> Joop >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ Users mailing >>>>>> list [email protected] >>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list >>>>> [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list >>>> [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> > -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
