Then I'm also out of ideas. You could take al look at the options in /etc/vdsm/vdsm.conf ( information at /usr/share/doc/vdsm-*/vdsm.conf.sample )
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Markus Stockhausen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Von: [email protected] [[email protected]]" im >> Auftrag von " >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2013 14:43 >> An: Markus Stockhausen >> Cc: ovirt-users >> Betreff: Re: [Users] Abysmal network performance inside hypervisor node >> >> I'm just wondering if the tested interfaces are bridged because I've >> seen some issues with >> network througput and bridged interfaces on my local system (F19). >> >> Basically, if an IP is configured on the bridge itself ( in oVirt this >> is the case if the network >> is configured as a VM network ) latency goes up and throughput goes down. >> >> Can you rule this one out by using an unbridged interface? > > I see. But my storage infiniband network is working without a bridge. > That was the mounting network device of my initial mail. So with > (ovirtmgmt) and without bridge (infiniband) I have the same problem. > > [root@colovn01 ~]# ifconfig ib1 > ib1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 2044 > inet 10.10.30.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.10.30.255 > inet6 fe80::223:7dff:ff94:d3fe prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> > Infiniband hardware address can be incorrect! Please read BUGS section in > ifconfig(8). > infiniband > 80:00:00:49:FE:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:00 txqueuelen 256 > (InfiniBand) > RX packets 3575120 bytes 7222538528 (6.7 GiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 10 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 416942 bytes 29156648 (27.8 MiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > Markus _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
