On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:25:05AM +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 04:04:03PM +0530, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > > >> > >> There are two ways in which GlusterFS can be used as a storage domain: > >> > >> a) Use gluster native/fuse access with POSIXFS > >> > >> b) Use the gluster native storage domain to bypass fuse (with > >> libgfapi). We are currently addressing an issue in libvirt > >> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017289) to enable > >> snapshot support with libgfapi. Once this is addressed, we will have > >> libgfapi support in the native storage domain. > > > > It won't be as immediate, since there's a required fix on Vdsm's side > > (Bug 1022961 - Running a VM from a gluster domain uses mount instead of > > gluster URI) > > > >> Till then, fuse would > >> be used with native storage domain. You can find more details about > >> native storage domain here: > >> > >> http://www.ovirt.org/Features/GlusterFS_Storage_Domain > rg/mailman/listinfo/users > > Hello, > revamping here.... > I'm using oVirt 3.3.3 beta1 after upgrade from 3.3.2 on fedora 19 > ovirt beta repo > It seems bug referred by Vijay (1017289) is still marked as > "assigned", but actually it is for rhel 6. > Bug referred by Dan (1022961) is marked as "blocked" but I don't see > any particular updates since late november. But it is for rhevm, so I > think it is for rhel 6... > So what is the situation for fedora 19 and oVirt in upcoming 3.3.3? > And upcoming fedora 19/20 and 3.4?
Neither bug has been fixed as of yet, I'm afraid. You should seem them change state to POST when there's code to be seen. Dan. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
